Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33690657›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Large-scale outbreak of Chikungunya virus infection in Thailand, 2018-2019.

Sarawut Khongwichit, Jira Chansaenroj, Thanunrat Thongmee, Saovanee Benjamanukul, Nasamon Wanlapakorn, Chintana Chirathaworn, Yong Poovorawan

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chikungunya outbreak in eastern Senegal, 2023.BMC infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chikungunya virus replicates in the human testisEmerging microbes & infections · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarawut KhongwichitDepartment of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jira ChansaenrojDepartment of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanunrat ThongmeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Saovanee BenjamanukulDepartment of Medicine, Banphaeo General Hospital, Samutsakhon, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3880-8446
Nasamon WanlapakornDepartment of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chintana ChirathawornDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yong PoovorawanDepartment of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2337-6807
Chulalongkorn University · THPhramongkutklao Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Between 2018 and 2019, the incidence of chikungunya was approximately 15,000 cases across 60 provinces in Thailand. Here, the clinical presentations in chikungunya, emergent pattern, and genomic diversity of the chikungunya virus (CHIKV) causing this massive outbreak were demonstrated. A total of 1,806 sera samples from suspected cases of chikungunya were collected from 13 provinces in Thailand, and samples were tested for the presence of CHIKV RNA, IgG, and IgM using real-time PCR, enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA), commercial immunoassay (rapid test). The phylogenetic tree of CHIKV whole-genome and CHIKV E1 were constructed using the maximum-likelihood method. CHIKV infection was confirmed in 547 (42.2%) male and 748 (57.8%) female patients by positive real-time PCR results and/or CHIKV IgM antibody titers. Unsurprisingly, CHIKV RNA was detected in >80% of confirmed cases between 1 and 5 days after symptom onset, whereas anti-CHIKV IgM was detectable in >90% of cases after day 6. Older age was clearly one of the risk factors for the development of arthralgia in infected patients. Although phylogenetic analysis revealed that the present CHIKV Thailand strain of 2018-2020 belongs to the East, Central, and Southern African (ECSA) genotype similar to the CHIKV strains that caused outbreaks during 2008-2009 and 2013, all present CHIKV Thailand strains were clustered within the recent CHIKV strain that caused an outbreak in South Asia. Interestingly, all present CHIKV Thailand strains possess two mutations, E1-K211E, and E2-V264A, in the background of E1-226A. These mutations are reported to be associated with virus-adapted Aedes aegypti. Taken together, it was likely that the present CHIKV outbreak in Thailand occurred as a result of the importation of the CHIKV strain from South Asia. Understanding with viral genetic diversity is essential for epidemiological study and may contribute to better disease management and preventive measures.

Indexed as

MutationAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAntibodies, ViralChikungunya FeverChikungunya virusChildChild, PreschoolDisease OutbreaksFemaleGenotypeHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID33690657
PMCPMC7946318
OpenAlexW3134442260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.