Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33690149›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2021

Exploring commissioners' understandings of early primary care network development: qualitative interview study.

Lynsey Warwick-Giles, Jonathan Hammond, Simon Bailey, Kath Checkland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring whether primary care networks can contribute to the national goal of reducing health inequalities: a mixed-methods study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transforming primary care in Scotland: a critical policy analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lynsey Warwick-GilesGP, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Division of Population Health, Health Service Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester.
Jonathan HammondGP, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Division of Population Health, Health Service Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester.
Simon BaileyCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury.
Kath ChecklandGP, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Division of Population Health, Health Service Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care networks (PCNs) are financially incentivised groupings of general practices in the English NHS. Their purpose is to deliver a number of policy goals set out in

aimTo explore commissioners' perspectives on the early development of PCNs. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative study of CCG staff using telephone interviews.

methodSemi-structured interviews were carried out with 37 CCG employees involved in PCN establishment. Interviewees were asked about local PCNs' characteristics, factors shaping development and form, activities to date, challenges and benefits, and their CCGs' relationship with PCNs. Interviewee responses were summarised within a matrix and analysed thematically.

resultsThree meta-themes were identified: the multifaceted role of the commissioner, tensions between PCN policy and locally commissioned services, and engaging the broader system. Interviewees reported that the policy potentially favours those PCNs working from a 'blank slate' and does not sufficiently account for the fact some GP practices and wider system organisations have been doing similar work already. The prescriptive, contractual nature of the policy has led to local challenges, trying to ensure that local good practices are not lost during implementation. Interviewees also considered an important part of their work to be protecting PCNs from the weight of expectations placed on them.

conclusionCCGs are well placed to understand the complexities of local systems and to facilitate PCNs and working practices between wider system partners. It is important that this local role is not lost as CCGs continue to merge and cover larger geographical populations.

Indexed as

General PracticeState MedicineHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchclinical commissioning groupsgeneral practicepolicy implementationprimary care networksqualitative researchworkforce

Identifiers

PMID33690149
PMCPMC8252856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.