Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33689470›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2021

Exploratory polarization facilitates mating partner selection in

Manuella R Clark-Cotton, Nicholas T Henderson, Michael Pablo, Debraj Ghose, Timothy C Elston, Daniel J Lew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Role of Gα-MAPK interaction in mating ofMolecular biology of the cell · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanism of commitment to a mating partner inMolecular biology of the cell · 2022
    Article
  6. Orientation of Cell Polarity by Chemical Gradients.Annual review of biophysics · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Chemotactic movement of a polarity site enables yeast cells to find their mates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manuella R Clark-CottonDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Nicholas T HendersonDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Michael PabloDepartment of Chemistry, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Debraj GhoseDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Timothy C ElstonDepartment of Pharmacology and Computational Medicine Program, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Daniel J LewDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.

Funding

Studies on cell polarity, chemotropism, and cell cycle controlR35GM122488 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DANIEL J LEW · 2017 to 2026
$6.9M
Mathematical modeling of cellular signaling systemsR35GM127145 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Timothy C Elston · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
Gradient Tracking and ChemotropismR01GM103870 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C, LEW, DANIEL J · 2013 to 2016
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103870NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122488NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yeast decode pheromone gradients to locate mating partners, providing a model for chemotropism. How yeast polarize toward a single partner in crowded environments is unclear. Initially, cells often polarize in unproductive directions, but then they relocate the polarity site until two partners' polarity sites align, whereupon the cells "commit" to each other by stabilizing polarity to promote fusion. Here we address the role of the early mobile polarity sites. We found that commitment by either partner failed if just one partner was defective in generating, orienting, or stabilizing its mobile polarity sites. Mobile polarity sites were enriched for pheromone receptors and G proteins, and we suggest that such sites engage in an exploratory search of the local pheromone landscape, stabilizing only when they detect elevated pheromone levels. Mobile polarity sites were also enriched for pheromone secretion factors, and simulations suggest that only focal secretion at polarity sites would produce high pheromone concentrations at the partner's polarity site, triggering commitment.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityMating FactorSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSecretory PathwayTropismMating Factor

Identifiers

PMID33689470
PMCPMC8101489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.