Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33689157›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

Prostate Cancer Screening and Young Black Men: Can Early Communication Avoid Later Health Disparities?

David B Miller, Sarah C Markt, Carvell T Nguyen, Oita C Coleman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Associations of Content and Context of Communication with Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David B MillerJack, Joseph, and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, 11235 Bellflower Road, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7164, USA. dbm5@case.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0387-9781
Sarah C MarktDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2873-0358
Carvell T NguyenDepartment of Urology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Oita C ColemanServant Voice Technologies Consulting LLC, Apex, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to determine if younger men, across racial and ethnic groups, discussed the benefits/risks/harms of PSA screening with health care professionals. Publicly available data were obtained from the Health Information National Trends Survey https://hints.cancer.gov/ in March 2019. Cross-sectional analysis of 518 men between the ages of 18 and 49 years from men who completed the survey between October 2011 and February 2012 (HINTS cycle 4) was performed. We used logistic regression to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and discussions around PSA. Less than 10% of the participants reported a prior PSA; Black and Hispanic men were more likely compared with White men. Compared with White men, Black and other race men reported receiving less communications from some doctors recommending PSA screening (OR

Indexed as

COVID-19Prostatic NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenYoung AdultProstate-Specific AntigenBlack menCancer screeningCommunicationInformed decision-makingProstate cancer knowledgeScreening guidelinesShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID33689157
PMCPMC7943410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.