Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33689024›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2022

Feasibility and Safety of Office-Based Transnasal Balloon Dilation for Neopharyngeal and Proximal Esophageal Strictures in Patients with a History of Head and Neck Carcinoma.

Anouk S Schimberg, David J Wellenstein, Henrieke W Schutte, J Honings, Henri A M Marres, Robert P Takes, Guido B van den Broek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anouk S SchimbergDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Anouk.schimberg@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7468-6410
David J WellensteinDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Henrieke W SchutteDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J HoningsDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Henri A M MarresDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Robert P TakesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Guido B van den BroekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and safety of office-based transnasal balloon dilation of neopharyngeal and proximal esophageal strictures in patients with a history of head and neck carcinoma. The secondary objective was to explore its effectiveness. This prospective case series included patients previously treated for head and neck carcinoma with neopharyngeal or proximal esophageal strictures who underwent transnasal balloon dilation under topical anesthesia. The target dilation diameter was 15 mm; if necessary dilation procedures were repeated every 2-4 weeks until this target was reached. Completion rates, adverse events, and patient experiences measured by VAS scores (0 = no complaints - 10 = unbearable complaints), dysphagia scores based on food consistency (0 = no dysphagia - 5 = unable to swallow liquids/saliva), and self-reported changes in swallowing symptoms were recorded. Follow-up was 2 months. Twenty-six procedures were performed in 12 patients, with a completion rate of 92%. One minor complication occurred, i.e. an infection of the dilation site. Tolerance of the procedure was good (median VAS = 2). The dysphagia score improved after a mean of 2.2 procedures per patient, however not significantly. Eight patients reported improvement in dysphagia, of whom 3 had recurrence of dysphagia within 1 month post-treatment. Office-based transnasal balloon dilation is a feasible and safe in-office procedure which is well-tolerated by patients. The dilations can improve dysphagia, although effects might be transient.

Indexed as

CarcinomaEsophageal StenosisDilatationFeasibility StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEsophageal stricturesHead and neck carcinomaOffice-basedTopical anesthesiaTransnasal balloon dilatation

Identifiers

PMID33689024
PMCPMC8844154
OpenAlexW3134361669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.