Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33689000›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2021

The gut microbiome of laboratory mice: considerations and best practices for translational research.

Aaron C Ericsson, Craig L Franklin

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. DGAT1 mediates sex-specific CD8Nature metabolism · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. FMT alleviates multidrug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron C EricssonUniversity of Missouri Metagenomics Center (MUMC), MU Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center (MU MMRRC), Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. ericssona@missouri.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3053-7269
Craig L FranklinUniversity of Missouri Metagenomics Center (MUMC), MU Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center (MU MMRRC), Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Missouri College · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

The Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center at the University of Missouri - ResourceU42OD010918 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI James Amos-Landgraf · 2012 to 2026
$25.1M
MUTANT MOUSE RESOURCE AND RESEARCH CENTER: ANIMAL EMBRYONIC STEM CELLSU42RR014821 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI FRANKLIN, CRAIG L · 2000 to 2011
$15.8M
NCRR NIH HHS U42 RR014821NIH HHS U42 OD010918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Just as the gut microbiota (GM) is now recognized as an integral mediator of environmental influences on human physiology, susceptibility to disease, and response to pharmacological intervention, so too does the GM of laboratory mice affect the phenotype of research using mouse models. Multiple experimental factors have been shown to affect the composition of the GM in research mice, as well as the model phenotype, suggesting that the GM represents a major component in experimental reproducibility. Moreover, several recent studies suggest that manipulation of the GM of laboratory mice can substantially improve the predictive power or translatability of data generated in mouse models to the human conditions under investigation. This review provides readers with information related to these various factors and practices, and recommendations regarding methods by which issues with poor reproducibility or translatability can be transformed into discoveries.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID33689000
PMCPMC8295156
OpenAlexW3135274983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.