Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688957›Full record

SynthesisBJS open2021

Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy: systematic review, meta-analysis and health economic model analysis of iatrogenic bile duct injury.

J M L Rystedt, J Wiss, J Adolfsson, L Enochsson, B Hallerbäck, P Johansson, C Jönsson, P Leander, J Österberg, A Montgomery

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Prevention of bile duct injury - A bird's eye view.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomies: an 11-year population-based study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Length of the Remnant Cystic Duct and Bile Duct Stone Recurrence: a Case‒Control Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

J M L RystedtDepartment of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden.
J WissSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU), Stockholm, Sweden.
J AdolfssonSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU), Stockholm, Sweden.
L EnochssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
B HallerbäckDepartment of Surgery, Northern Alvsborg Hospital, Trollhattan, Sweden.
P JohanssonPublicHealth&Economics, Stockholm,  Sweden.
C JönssonInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
P LeanderDepartment of Radiology, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
J ÖsterbergDepartment of Surgery, Mora Hospital, Mora, Sweden.
A MontgomeryDepartment of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBile duct injury (BDI) is a severe complication following cholecystectomy. Early recognition and treatment of BDI has been shown to reduce costs and improve patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess the effect and cost-effectiveness of routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in cholecystectomy.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis, combined with a health economic model analysis in the Swedish setting, was performed. Costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for routine versus selective IOC during cholecystectomy for different scenarios were calculated.

resultsIn this meta-analysis, eight studies with more than 2 million patients subjected to cholecystectomy and 9000 BDIs were included. The rate of BDI was estimated to 0.36 per cent when IOC was performed routinely, compared with to 0.53 per cent when used selectively, indicating an increased risk for BDI of 43 per cent when IOC was used selectively (odds ratio 1.43, 95 per cent c.i. 1.22 to 1.67). The model analysis estimated that seven injuries were avoided annually by routine IOC in Sweden, a population of 10 million. Over a 10-year period, 33 QALYs would be gained at an approximate net cost of €808 000 , at a cost per QALY of about €24 900.

conclusionRoutine IOC during cholecystectomy reduces the risk of BDI compared with the selective strategy and is a potentially cost-effective intervention.

Indexed as

Bile Duct DiseasesBile DuctsCholangiographyCholecystectomyCost-Benefit AnalysisCost SavingsHumansIatrogenic DiseaseIntraoperative CareIntraoperative ComplicationsModels, EconomicQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSweden

Identifiers

PMID33688957
PMCPMC7944855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.