Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688952›Full record

SynthesisBJS open2021

Discriminating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis by ultrasound imaging, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

W J Bom, M D Bolmers, S L Gans, C C van Rossem, A A W van Geloven, P M M Bossuyt, J Stoker, M A Boermeester

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Rapid MRI Abdomen for Assessment of Clinically Suspected Acute Appendicitis in the General Adult Population: a Systematic Review.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Appendicitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Computed tomography and clinical outcomes in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: Significance of periappendiceal fat tissue.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

W J BomDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M D BolmersDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
S L GansDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C C van RossemDepartment of Surgery, Tergooi Hospital Hilversum, Hilversum, the Netherlands.
A A W van GelovenDepartment of Surgery, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
P M M BossuytDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J StokerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M A BoermeesterDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLTergooi · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiscriminating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis is crucial. Patients with suspected complicated appendicitis are best treated by emergency surgery, whereas those with uncomplicated appendicitis may be treated with antibiotics alone. This study aimed to obtain summary estimates of the accuracy of ultrasound imaging, CT and MRI in discriminating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted by an electronic search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for studies describing the diagnostic accuracy of complicated versus uncomplicated appendicitis. Studies were included if the population comprised adults, and surgery or pathology was used as a reference standard. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed with QUADAS-2. Bivariable logitnormal random-effect models were used to estimate mean sensitivity and specificity.

resultsTwo studies reporting on ultrasound imaging, 11 studies on CT, one on MRI, and one on ultrasonography with conditional CT were included. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity in detecting complicated appendicitis could be calculated only for CT, because of lack of data for the other imaging modalities. For CT, mean sensitivity was 78 (95 per cent c.i. 64 to 88) per cent, and mean specificity was 91 (85 to 99) per cent. At a median prevalence of 25 per cent, the positive predictive value of CT for complicated appendicitis would be 74 per cent and its negative predictive value 93 per cent.

conclusionUltrasound imaging, CT and MRI have limitations in discriminating between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Although CT has far from perfect sensitivity, its negative predictive value for complicated appendicitis is high.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyAnti-Bacterial AgentsAppendicitisHumansSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID33688952
PMCPMC7944501
OpenAlexW3135588328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.