Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688836›Full record

Trial reportJMIR public health and surveillance2021

Effects of a Co-Design-Based Invitation Strategy on Participation in a Preventive Health Check Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Trine Thilsing, Lars Bruun Larsen, Anders Larrabee Sonderlund, Signe Skaarup Andreassen, Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen, Nanna Herning Svensson, Marie Dahl, Jens Sondergaard

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03913585 (Early Detection and Prevention of Lifestyle Related Diseases - Pilot2), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03913585 naunknown statusnot on this map

Early Detection and Prevention of Lifestyle Related Diseases - Pilot2

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2018 to 2020Enrolled4,800ConditionsLifestyle-Related DisorderArmsLifestyle intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Trine ThilsingResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2041-2219
Lars Bruun LarsenResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9120-4751
Anders Larrabee SonderlundResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6627-3322
Signe Skaarup AndreassenSteno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5837-7896
Jeanette Reffstrup ChristensenResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2412-5989
Nanna Herning SvenssonResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3359-498X
Marie DahlVascular Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Central Denmark, Viborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3814-1709
Jens SondergaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1629-1864
University of Southern Denmark · DKSteno Diabetes Centers · DKAarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreventive primary care programs that aim to reduce morbidity and mortality from lifestyle-related diseases are often affected by low-to-moderate participation rates. Improving participation rates is essential for clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. In 2016-2017, we conducted a pilot study (TOF pilot1) for a preventive primary care intervention (TOF is the Danish abbreviation for "Early Detection and Prevention"). Among 8814 invited patients, 3545 (40.22%) consented to participate, with the highest participation rates among women and patients with higher income, education, and employment.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a revised invitation strategy on invitation comprehensibility, the overall participation rate, and participant demography. The new strategy specifically targeted men and patients of low educational attainment.

methodsThis study was embedded in the second TOF pilot study (TOF pilot2, initiated in October 2018) that tested an adjusted intervention. The revised invitation strategy comprised a prenotification postcard and a new invitation that specifically targeted men and patients of low educational attainment. The new invitation was developed in a co-design process that included communication professionals and target-group representatives. The study sample consisted of 4633 patients aged between 29 and 59 years, who resided in one of two municipalities in the Region of Southern Denmark. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to one of four invitation groups. The control group (Group 1) received the original invitation used in TOF pilot1. The intervention groups received the original invitation and the prenotification postcard (Group 2), the new revised invitation and the prenotification postcard (Group 3), or the new invitation but no prenotification postcard (Group 4).

resultsOverall, 2171 (46.86%) patients consented to participate. Compared to the control group, participation rates increased significantly in all three intervention groups (all P<.001). Participation across the three intervention groups increased for women and men, as well as for patients with high and low educational attainment and high and low family income. The largest relative increase in participation rates occurred among men, patients with low educational attainment, and patients with low family income. No increase in participation was detected for unemployed patients or patients of non-Danish origin. Most participants found the original (813/987, 82.37%) and new (965/1133, 85.17%) invitations easy to understand with no significant difference (P=.08) in comprehensibility between invitations.

conclusionsThe results suggest that participation in preventive primary care interventions can be greatly increased by implementing a co-design-based invitation strategy that includes prenotification postcards and targeted invitations. Although firm conclusions cannot be made from this study, the observed increased participation rates for men and patients of low socioeconomic status may be relevant in programs that aim to reduce social inequality in health.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03913585; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03913585.

Indexed as

AdultCitiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPreventive Health ServicesPrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationSocioeconomic Factorsco-designinvitation letterparticipation rateprenotificationpreventive health checksprimary care

Identifiers

PMID33688836
PMCPMC7991992
OpenAlexW3130990855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.