Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688614›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2021

A covariate-constraint method to map brain feature space into lower dimensional manifolds.

Félix Renard, Christian Heinrich, Marine Bouthillon, Maleka Schenck, Francis Schneider, Stéphane Kremer, Sophie Achard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Félix RenardUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble, France.
Christian HeinrichiCube, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Illkirch, France.
Marine BouthilloniCube, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Illkirch, France.
Maleka SchenckService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Strasbourg, France.
Francis SchneiderService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Strasbourg, France.
Stéphane KremeriCube, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Illkirch, France.
Sophie AchardUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9448-1199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human brain connectome studies aim to both explore healthy brains, and extract and analyze relevant features associated with pathologies of interest. Usually this consists of modeling the brain connectome as a graph and using graph metrics as features. A fine brain description requires graph metrics computation at the node level. Given the relatively reduced number of patients in standard cohorts, such data analysis problems fall in the high-dimension, low-sample-size framework. In this context, our goal is to provide a machine learning technique that exhibits flexibility, gives the investigator an understanding of the features and covariates, allows visualization and exploration, and yields insight into the data and the biological phenomena at stake. The retained approach is dimension reduction in a manifold learning methodology; the originality is that the investigator chooses one (or several) reduced variables. The proposed method is illustrated in two studies. The first one addresses comatose patients; the second one compares young and elderly populations. The method sheds light on the differences between brain connectivity graphs using graph metrics and potential clinical interpretations of these differences.

Indexed as

ConnectomesGraphsHub disruption indexMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID33688614
PMCPMC7935034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.