Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688453›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

Physical characteristics of

Michael S Silosky, Ramesh Karki, Rustain Morgan, Janet Anderson, Bennett B Chin

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Modeling contrast-to-noise ratio from list mode reconstructions ofAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Small target repeatability ofAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael S SiloskyDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO, USA.
Ramesh KarkiDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO, USA.
Rustain MorganDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO, USA.
Janet AndersonDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, University of Colorado Health System Aurora, CO, USA.
Bennett B ChinDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMATERIALS AND

methods

resultsIn phantoms, recovery coefficient and SUV

conclusionVery high target or T/B, even in small targets, can offset the physical limitations of

Indexed as

18F68Ga68Ga DOTATATEdetectabilityphantom studysmall lesion

Identifiers

PMID33688453
PMCPMC7936248
OpenAlexW3134132730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.