Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688431›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2021

Intravitreal Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update.

Claudio Furino, Francesco Boscia, Michele Reibaldi, Giovanni Alessio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nonadherence to anti-VEGF intravitreal injections in patients with diabetic macular edema : The names of the authors.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Safety of an Intravitreal Bevacizumab Biosimilar (MVASI).Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Beyond VEGF: Targeting Inflammation and Other Pathways for Treatment of Retinal Disease.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudio FurinoDepartment of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Eye Clinic, University of Bari, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0254-7432
Francesco BosciaDepartment of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Eye Clinic, University of Bari, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5478-060X
Michele ReibaldiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1368-6729
Giovanni AlessioDepartment of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Eye Clinic, University of Bari, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8313-4159
Azienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Consorziale - Policlinico Bari · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic macular edema (DME) represents a prevalent and disabling eye condition. Despite that DME represents a sight-threatening condition, it is also among the most accessible to treatment. Many different treatment options including photocoagulation, intravitreal medical treatment (either vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors or corticosteroids therapies), and surgical removal are currently available. Although laser has been considered as the gold standard for many years, over the past several years vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGFs) have become first-line therapy. However, many patients do not adequately respond to them. With the development of sustained-release corticosteroid devices, steroids have gained a presence in the management of the DME. We review and update the role of anti-VEGF and intravitreal sustained-release corticosteroid management of DME. According to the currently available scientific evidence, the choice of one anti-VEGF over another critically depends on the baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). While aflibercept may be the drug of choice in low baseline BCVA, the three anti-VEGFs (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept) provided similar functional outcomes when the baseline BCVA was higher. DEX implants are a valuable option for treating DME, although they are usually seen as a second choice, particularly in those eyes that have an insufficient response to anti-VEGF. The new evidence suggested that, in eyes that did not adequately respond to anti-VEGF, switching to a DEX implant at the time to 3 monthly anti-VEGF injections provided better functional outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID33688431
PMCPMC7925023
OpenAlexW3130203857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.