Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688385›Full record

ArticlePain research & management2021

Awake Major Abdominal Surgeries in the COVID-19 Era.

Andrea Romanzi, Nicola Boleso, Giuseppe Di Palma, Davide La Regina, Francesco Mongelli, Maria Milanesi, Antonella Putortì, Fabrizio Rossi, Roberta Scolaro, Michel Zanardo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research & management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Awake robotic liver surgery: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Regional Anaesthesia in the Post-COVID Era.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2022
    Article
  9. Ventral hernia repair under neuraxial anesthesia.European surgery : ACA : Acta chirurgica Austriaca · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrea RomanziDepartment of General Surgery, Valduce Hospital, Como 22100, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3603-1338
Nicola BolesoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Valduce Hospital, Como 22100, Italy.
Giuseppe Di PalmaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Valduce Hospital, Como 22100, Italy.
Davide La ReginaDepartment of General Surgery, Regional Hospital of Bellinzona and Valli, Bellinzona 6500, Switzerland.
Francesco MongelliDepartment of General Surgery, Regional Hospital of Bellinzona and Valli, Bellinzona 6500, Switzerland.
Maria MilanesiDepartment of General Surgery, Valduce Hospital, Como 22100, Italy.
Antonella PutortìDepartment of General Surgery, Valduce Hospital, Como 22100, Italy.
Fabrizio RossiDepartment of General Surgery, Valduce Hospital, Como 22100, Italy.
Roberta ScolaroDepartment of General Surgery, Valduce Hospital, Como 22100, Italy.
Michel ZanardoDepartment of General Surgery, Valduce Hospital, Como 22100, Italy.
Alberto VannelliDepartment of General Surgery, Valduce Hospital, Como 22100, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8894-5361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), allocating intensive care beds to patients needing acute care surgery became a very difficult task. Moreover, since general anesthesia is an aerosol-generating procedure, its use became controversial. This strongly restricted therapeutic strategies. Here, we report a series of undeferrable surgical cases treated with awake surgery under neuraxial anesthesia. Contextual benefits of this approach are deepened. Methods: During the first pandemic surge, thirteen patients (5 men and 8 women) with a mean age of 80 years, needing undelayable surgery due to abdominal emergencies, underwent awake open surgery at our Hospital. Prior to surgery, all patients underwent nasopharyngeal swab tests for COVID-19 diagnosis. In all cases, regional anesthesia (spinal, epidural, or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia) was performed. Intraoperative and postoperative pain intensities have been monitored and regularly assessed. A distinct pathway has been set up to keep patients of uncertain COVID-19 diagnosis separated from all other patients. Postoperative course has been examined. Results: The mean operative time was 87 minutes (minimum 60 minutes; maximum 165 minutes). In one case, conversion to general anesthesia was necessary. Postoperative pain was always well controlled. None of them required postoperative intensive care support. No perioperative major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) occurred. Early readmission after surgery never occurred. All nasopharyngeal swabs resulted negative. Conclusions: In our experience, awake laparotomy under regional anesthesia resulted feasible, safe, painless, and, in specific cases, was the only viable option. This approach allowed prevention of the need of postoperative intensive monitoring during the COVID-19 era. In such a peculiar time, we believe it could become part of an ICU-preserving strategy and could limit viral transmission inside theatres.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesia, ConductionFemaleHumansLaparotomyMaleSARS-CoV-2Wakefulness

Identifiers

PMID33688385
PMCPMC7920720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.