Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688354›Full record

ReviewStem cells international2021

Stromal Vascular Fraction and Amniotic Epithelial Cells: Preclinical and Clinical Relevance in Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine.

Francesca Veronesi, Melania Maglio, Deyanira Contartese, Lucia Martini, Aurelio Muttini, Milena Fini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06040957 (Bone Marrow vs Adipose Tissue as a Cell Source for Infiltrative Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06040957 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Bone Marrow vs Adipose Tissue as a Cell Source for Infiltrative Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2024 to 2027Enrolled204ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsBone marrow aspirate concentrate injection, intra-articular injection of Minimally manipulated adipose tissue
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca VeronesiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Complex Structure of Surgical Sciences and Technologies, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6750-9376
Melania MaglioIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Complex Structure of Surgical Sciences and Technologies, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3778-4406
Deyanira ContarteseIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Complex Structure of Surgical Sciences and Technologies, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8611-5794
Lucia MartiniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Complex Structure of Surgical Sciences and Technologies, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5765-4839
Aurelio MuttiniFaculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2133-4144
Milena FiniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Complex Structure of Surgical Sciences and Technologies, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3732-3570
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITUniversity of Teramo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal regenerative medicine is mainly based on the use of cell therapy to heal damaged tissues such as bone, cartilage, and tendons. Throughout the years, different cell types have been employed for the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases, in particular, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from bone marrow (BMSCs) and adipose tissue (ADSCs). Though the results of these literature studies have been encouraging, there are some limitations, especially on long-term results. Recently, some interest has shifted towards new cell types such as the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and amniotic endothelial cells (AECs). The aim of the present literature review is to evaluate preclinical and clinical studies that used SVF and AECs for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration. Forty-eight preclinical and clinical studies, performed in the last 10 years, were identified. Both SVF and AECs, injected or implanted with or without scaffolds, were shown to be valid alternatives, and in some ways superior, to ADSCs and BMSCs, being able to differentiate towards osteogenic, chondrogenic, and tenogenic lineages, and to promote cell and tissue regenerative potential. The use of SVF and AECs could represent a new regenerative treatment in several musculoskeletal pathologies, solving the problem of cell expansion

Identifiers

PMID33688354
PMCPMC7920739
OpenAlexW3132044163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.