Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688339›Full record

ReviewNeural plasticity2021

Predicting Upcoming Events Occurring in the Space Surrounding the Hand.

Maria L Rangel, Lidiane Souza, Erika C Rodrigues, José M Oliveira, Michelle F Miranda, Antonio Galves, Claudia D Vargas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural plasticity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria L RangelLaboratório de Neurobiologia do Movimento, Instituto Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 21941 900.ORCID 0000-0002-4753-9113
Lidiane SouzaLaboratório de Neurobiologia do Movimento, Instituto Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 21941 900.ORCID 0000-0003-2241-969X
Erika C RodriguesPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta-UNISUAM, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 21041 020.ORCID 0000-0001-5464-2963
José M OliveiraLaboratório de Neurobiologia do Movimento, Instituto Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 21941 900.ORCID 0000-0002-6338-9792
Michelle F MirandaInstituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil 05508-090.ORCID 0000-0002-2673-4307
Antonio GalvesDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8757-715X
Claudia D VargasLaboratório de Neurobiologia do Movimento, Instituto Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 21941 900.ORCID 0000-0001-6202-3580
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity Center Augusto Motta · BRUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting upcoming sensorimotor events means creating forward estimates of the body and the surrounding world. This ability is a fundamental aspect of skilled motor behavior and requires an accurate and constantly updated representation of the body and the environment. To test whether these prediction mechanisms could be affected by a peripheral injury, we employed an action observation and electroencephalogram (EEG) paradigm to assess the occurrence of prediction markers in anticipation of observed sensorimotor events in healthy and brachial plexus injury (BPI) participants. Nine healthy subjects and six BPI patients watched a series of video clips showing an actor's hand and a colored ball in an egocentric perspective. The color of the ball indicated whether the hand would grasp it (hand movement), or the ball would roll toward the hand and touch it (ball movement), or no event would occur (no movement). In healthy participants, we expected to find distinct electroencephalographic activation patterns (EEG signatures) specific to the prediction of the occurrence of each of these situations. Cluster analysis from EEG signals recorded from electrodes placed over the sensorimotor cortex of control participants showed that predicting either an upcoming hand movement or the occurrence of a tactile event yielded specific neural signatures. In BPI participants, the EEG signals from the sensorimotor cortex contralateral to the dominant hand in the hand movement condition were different compared to the other conditions. Furthermore, there were no differences between ball movement and no movement conditions in the sensorimotor cortex contralateral to the dominant hand, suggesting that BPI blurred specifically the ability to predict upcoming tactile events for the dominant hand. These results highlight the role of the sensorimotor cortex in creating estimates of both actions and tactile interactions in the space around the body and suggest plastic effects on prediction coding following peripheral sensorimotor loss.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingElectroencephalographyFemaleHandHand StrengthHumansMaleMovementSensorimotor CortexSpace PerceptionTouchTouch PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33688339
PMCPMC7914383
OpenAlexW3133095197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.