ReviewNeural plasticity2021
Bibliometric Study of Pain after Spinal Cord Injury.
Review in Neural plasticity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shaping science: Scholarly motivation and research outcomes in NIH-HEAL funded studies.PloS one · 2026Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Exosome Research in Spinal Cord Injury (2000-May 2024). Trends, Collaborations, and Emerging Insights.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Global Research Trends on Gait Rehabilitation in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury- A Bibliometric Analysis.Global spine journal · 2024Review
- Global research characteristics and trends of infection after spinal implant surgery: a bibliometric analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Molecular approaches for spinal cord injury treatment.Neural regeneration research · 2023Review
- Thirty-year survey of bibliometrics used in the research literature of pain: Analysis, evolution, and pitfalls.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Bibliometric Analysis of Exercise and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Review
- Home-based cardiac rehabilitation: A review of bibliometric studies and visual analysis of CiteSpace (2012-2021).Medicine · 2022Review
- Scientific Knowledge Graph and Trend Analysis of Central Sensitization: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2022Article
- Scientific literature landscape analysis of researches on oxidative stress in intervertebral disc degeneration in web of science.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Global research status and hot trends in stem cells therapy for Intervertebral disc degeneration: A bibliometric and clinical study analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Knowledge Domains and Emerging Trends of Osteoblasts-Osteoclasts in Bone Disease From 2002 to 2021: A Bibliometrics Analysis and Visualization Study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Research Hotspots and Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Pain: A Bibliometric Analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Research Hotspots and Frontiers in Post Stroke Pain: A Bibliometric Analysis Study.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of comorbid pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) is relatively high in clinical observations and has continued to increase over time. Neuropathic pain (70.14%) is the most popular subject in academic journals after SCI. However, studies that used the bibliometric method to analyze comorbid pain after SCI are still lacking. This study is aimed at combining and integrating acquired information to analyze the global trends of research on the comorbidity of pain after SCI in the last three decades (1990-2019). Methods: Systematic works of literature published from 1990 to 2019 were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection. CiteSpace software was used to analyze the relationship of publication year with the country, institution, journals, authors, references, and keywords. The regression analysis is used to evaluate the percentage of the category increase or decrease over time significantly. IBM SPSS Statistics was used in the statistical analysis. Results: A total of 730 publications were included in the analysis. A remarkable increase in the number of publications was observed in the study period ( Conclusions: Overall, this study provides the latest research direction for pain after SCI. This historical overview of research into pain after SCI will be a useful basis for further research into development trends, focus issues, cooperators, and cooperative institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.