Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688335›Full record

ArticleAtmospheric chemistry and physics2020

Constraining remote oxidation capacity with ATom observations.

Katherine R Travis, Colette L Heald, Hannah M Allen, Eric C Apel, Stephen R Arnold, Donald R Blake, William H Brune, Xin Chen, Róisín Commane, John D Crounse and 22 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An observation-based, reduced-form model for oxidation in the remote marine troposphere.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.

Katherine R TravisDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Colette L HealdDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Hannah M AllenDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Eric C ApelAtmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
Stephen R ArnoldInstitute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Donald R BlakeDepartment of Chemistry, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
William H BruneDepartment of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Xin ChenUniversity of Minnesota, Department of Soil, Water and Climate, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Róisín CommaneDept. of Earth & Environmental Sciences of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA.
John D CrounseDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Bruce C DaubeHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Glenn S DiskinNASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA.
James W ElkinsGlobal Monitoring Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Mathew J EvansWolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories (WACL), Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, UK.
Samuel R HallAtmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
Eric J HintsaGlobal Monitoring Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Rebecca S HornbrookAtmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
Prasad S KasibhatlaNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Michelle J KimDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Gan LuoAtmospheric Sciences Research Center, University of Albany, Albany, NY, USA.
Kathryn McKainGlobal Monitoring Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Dylan B MilletUniversity of Minnesota, Department of Soil, Water and Climate, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Fred L MooreGlobal Monitoring Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Jeffrey PeischlCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, University of Colorado, CO, USA.
Thomas B RyersonChemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Tomás SherwenWolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories (WACL), Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, UK.
Alexander B ThamesDepartment of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Kirk UllmannAtmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
Xuan WangHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Paul O WennbergDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Glenn M WolfeAtmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.
Fangqun YuAtmospheric Sciences Research Center, University of Albany, Albany, NY, USA.
California Institute of Technology · USCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences · USNSF National Center for Atmospheric Research · USAlbany State University · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USNational Centre for Atmospheric Science · GBNOAA Earth System Research Laboratory · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USDuke University · USGoddard Space Flight Center · USLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory · USLangley Research Center · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

NASA NNX14AP89G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global oxidation capacity, defined as the tropospheric mean concentration of the hydroxyl radical (OH), controls the lifetime of reactive trace gases in the atmosphere such as methane and carbon monoxide (CO). Models tend to underestimate the methane lifetime and CO concentrations throughout the troposphere, which is consistent with excessive OH. Approximately half of the oxidation of methane and non-methane volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is thought to occur over the oceans where oxidant chemistry has received little validation due to a lack of observational constraints. We use observations from the first two deployments of the NASA ATom aircraft campaign during July-August 2016 and January-February 2017 to evaluate the oxidation capacity over the remote oceans and its representation by the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model. The model successfully simulates the magnitude and vertical profile of remote OH within the measurement uncertainties. Comparisons against the drivers of OH production (water vapor, ozone, and NO

Identifiers

PMID33688335
PMCPMC7939060
OpenAlexW2998204852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.