Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688334›Full record

ArticleAtmospheric chemistry and physics2019

On the sources and sinks of atmospheric VOCs: an integrated analysis of recent aircraft campaigns over North America.

Xin Chen, Dylan B Millet, Hanwant B Singh, Armin Wisthaler, Eric C Apel, Elliot L Atlas, Donald R Blake, Ilann Bourgeois, Steven S Brown, John D Crounse and 24 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Using Hybrid PDI-FeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. NOJournal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Satellite Formaldehyde to Support Model Evaluation.Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Inferring Changes in Summertime Surface Ozone-NOEnvironmental science & technology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Xin ChenDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Dylan B MilletDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Hanwant B SinghNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA.
Armin WisthalerInstitute for Ion Physics and Applied Physics, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Eric C ApelAtmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
Elliot L AtlasDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Donald R BlakeDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Ilann BourgeoisChemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Steven S BrownChemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
John D CrounseDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Joost A de GouwChemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Frank M FlockeAtmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
Alan FriedInstitute of Arctic & Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Brian G HeikesGraduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI, USA.
Rebecca S HornbrookAtmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
Tomas MikovinyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kyung-Eun MinSchool of Earth Science and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, South Korea.
Markus MüllerInstitute for Ion Physics and Applied Physics, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
J Andrew NeumanChemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Daniel W O'SullivanUnited States Naval Academy, Chemistry Department, Annapolis, MD, USA.
Jeff PeischlChemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Gabriele G PfisterAtmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
Dirk RichterInstitute of Arctic & Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
James M RobertsChemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Thomas B RyersonChemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Stephen R ShertzAtmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
Chelsea R ThompsonChemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Victoria TreadawayGraduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI, USA.
Patrick R VeresChemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
James WalegaInstitute of Arctic & Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Carsten WarnekeChemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Rebecca A WashenfelderChemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Petter WeibringInstitute of Arctic & Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Bin YuanInstitute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

NASA NNX14AP89G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We apply a high-resolution chemical transport model (GEOS-Chem CTM) with updated treatment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and a comprehensive suite of airborne datasets over North America to (i) characterize the VOC budget and (ii) test the ability of current models to capture the distribution and reactivity of atmospheric VOCs over this region. Biogenic emissions dominate the North American VOC budget in the model, accounting for 70 % and 95 % of annually emitted VOC carbon and reactivity, respectively. Based on current inventories anthropogenic emissions have declined to the point where biogenic emissions are the dominant summertime source of VOC reactivity even in most major North American cities. Methane oxidation is a 2x larger source of nonmethane VOCs (via production of formaldehyde and methyl hydroperoxide) over North America in the model than are anthropogenic emissions. However, anthropogenic VOCs account for over half of the ambient VOC loading over the majority of the region owing to their longer aggregate lifetime. Fires can be a significant VOC source episodically but are small on average. In the planetary boundary layer (PBL), the model exhibits skill in capturing observed variability in total VOC abundance (

Identifiers

PMID33688334
PMCPMC7939023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.