Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688309›Full record

ArticleOccupational therapy international2021

Psychometric Properties of the Sensory Processing and Self-Regulation Checklist: English Version.

Ivan Neil B Gomez, Angelika Pauline Calsa, Jerika Toni Esguerra, Prince Joseph Heric Penetrante, Kenneth Porlucas, Maria Erica Santos, Carla Beatrice Umali, Cynthia Y Y Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational therapy international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ivan Neil B GomezCenter for Health Research and Movement Science, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4158-2062
Angelika Pauline CalsaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
Jerika Toni EsguerraDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
Prince Joseph Heric PenetranteDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
Kenneth PorlucasDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
Maria Erica SantosDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
Carla Beatrice UmaliDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
Cynthia Y Y LaiDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-7089

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSensory processing supports children's development and abilities to participate in activities across contexts. Self-regulation skills may influence how children process various sensory experiences in daily life activities. The Sensory Processing and Self-Regulation Checklist (SPSRC) is a 130-item caregiver-reported checklist, covering children's essential sensory processing and self-regulation performance in daily activities.

objectivesThis study examines the psychometric properties of the SPSRC (English version) in measuring the sensory processing and self-regulation abilities of children.

methodsA preliminary field testing of the SPSRC-English was conducted in a sample of

resultsThe SPSRC-English was shown to have high internal consistency and test-retest reliability; and good discriminant, structural, and criterion validity in the sensory processing and self-regulation abilities of children with and without disability ages 4-12 years.

conclusionThe current study provides initial evidence on the reliability and validity of SPSRC-English in measuring the sensory processing and self-regulation abilities in children with and without a disability. The SPSRC-English may provide salient information supporting the understanding of sensory processing difficulties among children.

Indexed as

Self-ControlAutism Spectrum DisorderChecklistChildChild, PreschoolDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleHumansMalePerceptionPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33688309
PMCPMC7920736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.