ArticleJournal of experimental pharmacology2021
Evaluation of the Diuretic Activity of Aqueous and 80% Methanol Extracts of
Article in Journal of experimental pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Secondary Metabolites fromMetabolites · 2025Review
- Medicinal plants administered to control hypertension in Ethiopia: ethnomedicine, pharmacology, nutraceutical, phytochemistry, toxicology, and policy perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- The Chemical and Pharmacological Research Progress on a Kind of Chinese Herbal Medicine,Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Unveiling Nephroprotective, Diuretic and Toxicity Response ofDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsRats of either sex were randomly assigned into eight groups of eight animals per group. The animals were treated with vehicle (distilled water), standard (furosemide 10 mg/kg), and three doses (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg) of aqueous and 80% methanol leaf extracts after loading of normal saline (15 mL/kg). Then, urine volume, electrolyte concentration, and pH were measured as parameters of evaluation. Concentrations of urinary Na
resultsThe aqueous extract at 200 mg/kg had produced significant diuresis by hour 3, while the same dose of 80% methanol extract had produced substantial diuresis by the end of hour 4. Both extracts at 400 mg/kg produced significant diuresis from hour 2 to hour 5. In terms of effect on electrolysis, 400 mg/kg aqueous extract produced significant natriuresis, and a kaliuresis effect was observed for both extracts at higher doses and 200 mg/kg aqueous extract.
conclusionThe findings collectively indicated that both aqueous and 80% methanol extract showed significant diuretic activity, thereby justifying the plant's traditional use as a diuretic agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.