Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688110›Full record

ArticleEthology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie2019

Behaviour before beauty: signal weighting during mate selection in the butterfly

Erica L Westerman, Nicholas Antonson, Sydney Kreutzmann, Alexandra Peterson, Skyy Pineda, Marcus R Kronforst, Carrie F Olson-Manning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genomic architecture and functional unit of mimicry supergene in female limited Batesian mimicPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erica L WestermanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas.ORCID 0000-0002-3575-8298
Nicholas AntonsonBiology Department, Augustana University.
Sydney KreutzmannBiology Department, Augustana University.
Alexandra PetersonBiology Department, Augustana University.
Skyy PinedaBiology Department, Augustana University.
Marcus R KronforstDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago.
Carrie F Olson-ManningBiology Department, Augustana University.

Funding

Wichozani-A Healthy Lifestyle for Rural American Indian Youth through Cultural and Physical Activities: A Community-Based Participatory Research StudyP20GM103443 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI Ryan Michael Johnson · 2012 to 2026
$58.1M
Characterizing the Molecular Basis of Supergene Mimicry in ButterfliesR01GM108626 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KRONFORST, MARCUS · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103443NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mating displays often contain multiple signals. Different combinations of these signals may be equally successful at attracting a mate, as environment and signal combination may influence relative signal weighting by choosy individuals. This variation in signal weighting among choosy individuals may facilitate the maintenance of polymorphic displays and signalling behaviour. One group of animals known for their polymorphic patterning are Batesian mimetic butterflies, where the interaction of sexual selection and predation pressures are hypothesized to influence the maintenance of polymorphic wing patterning and behaviour. Males in the female-limited polymorphic Batesian mimetic butterfly

Indexed as

male preferencemate preferencemimicrypolymorphismsexual selection

Identifiers

PMID33688110
PMCPMC7938376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.