Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688029›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Injury-related deaths in the Ontario provincial trauma system: a retrospective population-based cohort analysis.

Christopher C D Evans, Wenbin Li, Dallas Seitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Disparities in Access to Trauma Care in Canada: A Geospatial Analysis of Census Data.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  4. A comparison of clinical prediction scores for massive traumatic hemorrhage.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher C D EvansDepartment of Emergency Medicine (Evans), Queen's University; ICES Queen's (Evans, Li), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Seitz), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. c.evans@queensu.ca.
Wenbin LiDepartment of Emergency Medicine (Evans), Queen's University; ICES Queen's (Evans, Li), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Seitz), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Dallas SeitzDepartment of Emergency Medicine (Evans), Queen's University; ICES Queen's (Evans, Li), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Seitz), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough Ontario has an established trauma system, it experiences a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality from injury. Our objective was to describe patterns of fatal injury in Ontario, with a focus on location of death (out of hospital, trauma or non-trauma centre) and receipt of surgical intervention before death.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using linked administrative data on fatal injuries in children and adults (no age restrictions) in Ontario between 2000 and 2016. We identified injury-related deaths in the Ontario Registrar General Death database. We developed descriptive statistics for injury characteristics and causes of death. We calculated the fatal injury incidence rate for each year of the study. The primary outcome was cause of death; the secondary outcome was receipt of surgical intervention.

resultsThe analysis included 19 408 people. The mean annual incidence of fatal injury averaged 8.7 (95% confidence interval 7.7-9.6) per 100 000. The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle collisions (12 065, 62.2%), followed by gunshot wounds (3134, 16.1%) and falls (2387, 12.3%). Deaths frequently occurred out of hospital (72.6%), rather than at a trauma centre (14.2%) or non-trauma centre (13.2%). Patients treated at trauma centres were significantly more likely to receive a surgical intervention (standardized difference 0.6) than those treated at non-trauma centres.

interpretationMost injury deaths in Ontario occur in the out-of-hospital setting or are managed at non-trauma centres; many patients receive no surgical intervention before death. There are likely opportunities to improve access to specialized injury care in Ontario's trauma system.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityTrauma CentersAccidental FallsAccidents, TrafficAdolescentAdultAgedChildCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33688029
PMCPMC8034298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.