Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33688008›Full record

ArticlemBio2021

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Requires

Julie S Valastyan, Christina M Kraml, Istvan Pelczer, Thomas Ferrante, Bonnie L Bassler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie S ValastyanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Christina M KramlLotus Separations LLC, Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Istvan PelczerDepartment of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Thomas FerranteDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Bonnie L BasslerDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA bbassler@princeton.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0043-746X

Funding

Intra- and Inter- Species Communication in BacteriaR37GM065859 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BASSLER, BONNIE L · 2016 to 2025
$3.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM065859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quorum sensing is a process of cell-to-cell communication that bacteria use to orchestrate collective behaviors. Quorum sensing depends on the production, release, and detection of extracellular signal molecules called autoinducers (AIs) that accumulate with increasing cell density. While most AIs are species specific, the AI called AI-2 is produced and detected by diverse bacterial species, and it mediates interspecies communication. We recently reported that mammalian cells produce an AI-2 mimic that can be detected by bacteria through the AI-2 receptor LuxP, potentially expanding the role of the AI-2 system to interdomain communication. Here, we describe a second molecule capable of interdomain signaling through LuxP, 4-hydroxy-5-methylfuran-3(2H)-one (MHF), that is produced by the yeast

Indexed as

Quorum SensingBacteriaBacterial ProteinsFuransHomoserineLactonesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSignal Transduction4-hydroxy-5-methyl-3(2H)-furanoneBacterial ProteinsFuransHomoserineLactonesN-octanoylhomoserine lactoneautoinducercollective behaviorinterspeciesquorum sensingsignalingyeast

Identifiers

PMID33688008
PMCPMC8092285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.