Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33687955›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Sex differences and factors associated with disability among Ghana's workforce: a nationally stratified cross-sectional study.

John Tetteh, Isaac Ofori Asare, Isaac Adomako, Emilia Asuquo Udofia, Nana Ayegua Hagan Seneadza, Evelyn Adjei-Mensah, Benedict N L Calys-Tagoe, Swithin Mustapha Swaray, George Ekem-Ferguson, Alfred Yawson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John TettehDepartment of Community Health, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana bigjayasamoah@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1986-4103
Isaac Ofori AsareDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Accra Technical University, Accra, Ghana.
Isaac AdomakoDepartment of Community Health, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Emilia Asuquo UdofiaDepartment of Community Health, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Nana Ayegua Hagan SeneadzaDepartment of Community Health, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Evelyn Adjei-MensahDepartment of Community Health, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Benedict N L Calys-TagoeDepartment of Community Health, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6133-240X
Swithin Mustapha SwarayNational Cardiothoracic Centre, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
George Ekem-FergusonNational Cardiothoracic Centre, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Alfred YawsonDepartment of Community Health, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
University of Ghana · GHKorle Bu Teaching Hospital · GHAccra Technical University · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of disability and associated factors and further quantify the associated sex differential among Ghana's workforce aged 15+ years.

designA nationally stratified cross-sectional study.

settingGhana.

participantsIndividuals aged 15 years and above. OUTCOME MEASURE: Disability that limits full participation in life activities.

methodsThree predictive models involving Poisson, logistic and probit regression were performed to assess the association between disability and covariates. Modified Poisson multivariate decomposition analysis method was employed to assess sex differential and associated factors using Stata V.16.

resultsThe prevalence of disability was 2.1% (95% CI 1.2 to 2.4), and the risk of disability among males was approximately twice compared with females (Poisson estimate: adjusted prevalence ratio (95% CI)=1.94 (1.46 to 2.57); logistic estimate: aOR (95% CI)=2.32 (1.73 to 3.12)). Male sex increased the log odds of disability by 0.37 (probit estimate, aβ (95% CI)=0.37 (0.23 to 0.50)). The variability in age group, marital status, household (HH) size, region, place of residence, relationship to HH head, hours of work per week and asset-based wealth were significantly associated with disability-based sex differential. (Significant increased endowment: β×10

conclusionThe magnitude of experiencing disability among working males was nearly twice that of females. Sex differentials were significantly associated with age groups, marital status, HH size, region of residence, relationship to HH head, hours of work per week and wealth. Our findings amass the provisional needs of persons living with a disability that are indicators to consider to achieve the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Article 10. In addition, formulation of workplace policies should adopt a gender-sensitive approach to reduce disparities and eliminate disability in the target population.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingPersons with DisabilitiesAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaHumansMaleSex CharacteristicsSex FactorsWorkforceepidemiologyoccupational & industrial medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID33687955
PMCPMC7944976
OpenAlexW3134745598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.