ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2021
Multi-Atlas Image Soft Segmentation via Computation of the Expected Label Value.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient cosine-windowed cross-correlation for intermediate deformable image registration.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automatic Geometry-based Estimation of the Locus Coeruleus Region on TbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Automatic geometry-based estimation of the locus coeruleus region on TFrontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Intermediate Deformable Image Registration via Windowed Cross-Correlation.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2023Article
- Dilated convolution network with edge fusion block and directional feature maps for cardiac MRI segmentation.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of multiple atlases is common in medical image segmentation. This typically requires deformable registration of the atlases (or the average atlas) to the new image, which is computationally expensive and susceptible to entrapment in local optima. We propose to instead consider the probability of all possible atlas-to-image transformations and compute the expected label value (ELV), thereby not relying merely on the transformation deemed "optimal" by the registration method. Moreover, we do so without actually performing deformable registration, thus avoiding the associated computational costs. We evaluate our ELV computation approach by applying it to brain, liver, and pancreas segmentation on datasets of magnetic resonance and computed tomography images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.