Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33687748›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2021

Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia risk with insulin glargine 300 U/mL and insulin degludec 100 U/mL in older participants in the BRIGHT trial.

Geremia B Bolli, Alice Cheng, Bernard Charbonnel, Vanita R Aroda, Jukka Westerbacka, Zsolt Bosnyak, Emmanuelle Boëlle-Le Corfec, Julio Rosenstock

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Optimizing Type 2 Diabetes Management in Iraq: Expert Consensus on Initiation and Intensification of Insulin-Based Treatment Options.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Clinical Use of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Hypothetical Case Studies.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Geremia B BolliDepartment of Medicine, Perugia University Medical School, Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4966-4003
Alice ChengDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bernard CharbonnelNantes University, Nantes, France.
Vanita R ArodaDivision of Endocrinology, Hypertension, and Diabetes, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7706-4585
Jukka WesterbackaSanofi, Paris, France.
Zsolt BosnyakSanofi, Paris, France.
Emmanuelle Boëlle-Le CorfecSanofi, Paris, France.
Julio RosenstockDallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8324-3275
Sanofi (France) · FRBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDallas Diabetes Research Center · USNantes Université · FRUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg-100) in predefined (</≥65 years) and post hoc (</≥70 years) age groups of people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the BRIGHT trial. MATERIALS AND

methodsBRIGHT was the first head-to-head randomized trial comparing Gla-300 and Deg-100 in insulin-naïve adults with T2D. In this subanalysis, endpoints were studied by predefined (</≥65 years, N = 596/333) and post hoc (</≥70 years, N = 768/161) age groups.

resultsHeterogeneity of treatment effect was observed for HbA1c reductions across the </≥70 years subgroups, but not across the </≥ 65 years subgroups, with greater HbA1c reductions with Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 in those 70 years or older (least squares mean -0.34% [95% confidence interval: -0.589% to -0.100%]). There was no significant heterogeneity of treatment effect for incidence and rates of confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) hypoglycaemia across any age subgroups over 24 weeks, but numerically lower incidence and rates were consistently observed for Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 in the 65 years or older and 70 years or older age groups in the initial 12 weeks.

conclusionsGla-300 may be a suitable treatment option in the growing population of older people with T2D. Further investigation is required to determine Gla-300 glycaemic benefits in high-risk populations without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypoglycemiaAdultAgedBlood GlucoseChild, PreschoolGlycated HemoglobinGlycemic ControlHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInfantInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic Agentsinsulin degludecInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-Actingbasal insulindiabetes complicationsinsulin analoguesrandomized trialtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33687748
PMCPMC8252805
OpenAlexW3134146806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.