ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2021
Improved Variant Detection in Clinical Myeloid NGS Testing by Supplementing a Commercial Myeloid NGS Assay with Custom or Extended Data Filtering and Accessory Fragment Analysis.
Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paired comparison of the analytical performance between the Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v3 and whole-exome sequencing of ovarian cancer tissue.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommercial myeloid next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels may facilitate uniform generation of raw data between laboratories. However, different strategies for data filtering and variant annotation may contribute to differences in variant detection and reporting. Here, we present how custom data filtering or the use of Oncomine extended data filtering improve detection of clinically relevant mutations with the Oncomine Myeloid Research Assay.
methodsThe study included all patient samples (n = 264) analyzed during the first-year, single-site, clinical use of the Ion Torrent Oncomine Myeloid Research Assay. In data analysis, the default analysis filter was supplemented with our own data filtering algorithm in order to detect additional clinically relevant mutations. In addition, we developed a sensitive supplementary test for the ASXL1 c.1934dupG p.Gly646fs mutation by fragment analysis.
resultsUsing our custom filter chain, we found 96 different reportable variants that were not detected by the default filter chain. Twenty-six of these were classified as variants of strong or potential clinical significance (tier I/tier II variants), and the custom filtering discovered otherwise undetected tier I/tier II variants in 25 of 132 patients with clinically relevant mutations (19%). The remaining 70 variants not detected by the default filter chain were classified as variants of unknown significance. Among these were several unique variants with possible pathogenic potential judged by bioinformatic predictions. The recently launched Oncomine 5.14 extended filter algorithm detects most but not all of the tier I/tier II variants that were not detected by the default filter. The supplementary fragment analysis for the ASXL1 c.1934dupG p.Gly646fs confidently detected a variant allele frequency of down to 4.8% (SD 0.83%). The assay also detected the ASXL1 c.1900_1922del23 mutation.
conclusionDetection of clinically relevant variants with the Oncomine Myeloid Research NGS assay can be significantly improved by supplementing the default filter chain with custom data filtering or the recently launched Oncomine 5.14 extended filter algorithm. Our accessory fragment analysis facilitates easy testing for frequent ASXL1 mutations that are poorly or not covered by the NGS assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.