Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33687704›Full record

ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2021

Improved Variant Detection in Clinical Myeloid NGS Testing by Supplementing a Commercial Myeloid NGS Assay with Custom or Extended Data Filtering and Accessory Fragment Analysis.

Lone Schejbel, Guy Wayne Novotny, Marie Fredslund Breinholt, Daniel El Fassi, Claudia Schöllkopf, Estrid Hogdall, Peter Nørgaard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. HemaSphere · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lone SchejbelDepartment of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 73, 2730, Herlev, Denmark. Lone.schejbel.dupont@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3677-3227
Guy Wayne NovotnyDepartment of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 73, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Marie Fredslund BreinholtDepartment of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 73, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Daniel El FassiDepartment of Hematology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Claudia SchöllkopfDepartment of Hematology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Estrid HogdallDepartment of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 73, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Peter NørgaardDepartment of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 73, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Gentofte Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommercial myeloid next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels may facilitate uniform generation of raw data between laboratories. However, different strategies for data filtering and variant annotation may contribute to differences in variant detection and reporting. Here, we present how custom data filtering or the use of Oncomine extended data filtering improve detection of clinically relevant mutations with the Oncomine Myeloid Research Assay.

methodsThe study included all patient samples (n = 264) analyzed during the first-year, single-site, clinical use of the Ion Torrent Oncomine Myeloid Research Assay. In data analysis, the default analysis filter was supplemented with our own data filtering algorithm in order to detect additional clinically relevant mutations. In addition, we developed a sensitive supplementary test for the ASXL1 c.1934dupG p.Gly646fs mutation by fragment analysis.

resultsUsing our custom filter chain, we found 96 different reportable variants that were not detected by the default filter chain. Twenty-six of these were classified as variants of strong or potential clinical significance (tier I/tier II variants), and the custom filtering discovered otherwise undetected tier I/tier II variants in 25 of 132 patients with clinically relevant mutations (19%). The remaining 70 variants not detected by the default filter chain were classified as variants of unknown significance. Among these were several unique variants with possible pathogenic potential judged by bioinformatic predictions. The recently launched Oncomine 5.14 extended filter algorithm detects most but not all of the tier I/tier II variants that were not detected by the default filter. The supplementary fragment analysis for the ASXL1 c.1934dupG p.Gly646fs confidently detected a variant allele frequency of down to 4.8% (SD 0.83%). The assay also detected the ASXL1 c.1900_1922del23 mutation.

conclusionDetection of clinically relevant variants with the Oncomine Myeloid Research NGS assay can be significantly improved by supplementing the default filter chain with custom data filtering or the recently launched Oncomine 5.14 extended filter algorithm. Our accessory fragment analysis facilitates easy testing for frequent ASXL1 mutations that are poorly or not covered by the NGS assay.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleGenetic VariationHumansMaleMutationMyeloid CellsRepressor ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNAASXL1 protein, humanRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33687704
OpenAlexW3134359100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.