Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33687699›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2021

Computerized assessment of dominance hierarchy in baboons (Papio papio).

Julie Gullstrand, Nicolas Claidière, Joël Fagot

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julie GullstrandLaboratory of Cognitive Psychology, CNRS UMR 7290, Aix-Marseille University, 3 Place Victor Hugo, Bât. 9, Case D, 13331, Marseille cedex 1, France. julie.gullstrand@univ-amu.fr.
Nicolas ClaidièreLaboratory of Cognitive Psychology, CNRS UMR 7290, Aix-Marseille University, 3 Place Victor Hugo, Bât. 9, Case D, 13331, Marseille cedex 1, France.
Joël FagotLaboratory of Cognitive Psychology, CNRS UMR 7290, Aix-Marseille University, 3 Place Victor Hugo, Bât. 9, Case D, 13331, Marseille cedex 1, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dominance hierarchies are an important aspect of Primate social life, and there is an increasing need to develop new systems to collect social information automatically. The main goal of this research was to explore the possibility to infer the dominance hierarchy of a group of Guinea baboons (Papio papio) from the analysis of their spontaneous interactions with freely accessible automated learning devices for monkeys (ALDM, Fagot & Bonté Behavior Research Methods, 42, 507-516, 2010). Experiment 1 compared the dominance hierarchy obtained from conventional observations of agonistic behaviours to the one inferred from the analysis of automatically recorded supplanting behaviours within the ALDM workstations. The comparison, applied to three different datasets, shows that the dominance hierarchies obtained with the two methods are highly congruent (all rs ≥ 0.75). Experiment 2 investigated the experimental potential of inferring dominance hierarchy from ALDM testing. ALDM data previously published in Goujon and Fagot (Behavioural Brain Research, 247, 101-109, 2013) were re-analysed for that purpose. Results indicate that supplanting events within the workstations lead to a transient improvement of cognitive performance for the baboon supplanting its partners and that this improvement depends on the difference in rank between the two baboons. This study therefore opens new perspectives for cognitive studies conducted in a social context.

Indexed as

Papio papioAnimalsLearningPapioPrimatesSocial DominanceAutomatized testingDominance hierarchyMonkeySocial cognitionSupplanting behaviours

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.