Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33687695›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2021

Cost-effectiveness of Empagliflozin Compared with Dapagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Established Cardiovascular Disease in Greece.

George Gourzoulidis, Charalampos Tzanetakos, Ioannis Ioannidis, Vasilis Tsimihodimos, Viana Diogo, George Karpouzos, Giannis Papageorgiou, Georgia Kourlaba

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

George GourzoulidisECONCARE LP, Athens, Greece. g.gourzoulidis@econcare.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7239-9829
Charalampos TzanetakosECONCARE LP, Athens, Greece.
Ioannis IoannidisDiabetes Centre, Department of Internal Medicine, Konstantopouleio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Vasilis TsimihodimosDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Viana DiogoBoehringer Ingelheim, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
George KarpouzosBoehringer Ingelheim Hellas, Athens, Greece.
Giannis PapageorgiouBoehringer Ingelheim Hellas, Athens, Greece.
Georgia KourlabaECONCARE LP, Athens, Greece.
Agia Olga Hospital · GRBoehringer Ingelheim (Netherlands) · NLMemorialCare Health System · USUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accounts for approximately 95% of all diabetes cases and is associated with a substantially elevated risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) that is 2- to 4-times higher in patients with T2DM compared to those without. The aim of present study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of empagliflozin compared to dapagliflozin for the treatment of patients with T2DM and established CVD in Greece.

methodsA published health economic model was used to project clinical and economic outcomes of T2DM patients receiving empagliflozin compared to those receiving dapagliflozin. Individual patient-level discrete-event simulation was conducted to predict time-to-event for CV, renal, and adverse events over patients' lifetimes. Hazard ratios for dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin on each clinical event was estimated from DECLARE-TIMI 58 and EMPA-REG OUTCOME trials' data using an indirect treatment comparison. Following a public payer perspective, only direct medical costs related to drug acquisition, fatal/non-fatal diabetes-related complications and adverse events were considered (€2020). Model extrapolated outcomes included life years (LY), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs as well as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of changes in input data.

resultsOver a patient's lifetime, empagliflozin was associated with longer mean survival (17.23 LY with empagliflozin vs 16.07 LY with dapagliflozin) and reduced rate of CV mortality resulting in 0.48 more QALYs (9.27 vs 8.79), at additional costs of €462. The generated ICER of empagliflozin was €965 per QALY gained. Deterministic sensitivity analysis confirmed empagliflozin's cost-effective profile. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the probability of empagliflozin being cost effective over dapagliflozin was 100%, at the defined threshold of €36,000 per QALY gained.

conclusionEmpagliflozin was estimated to be a highly cost-effective treatment option compared to dapagliflozin for the treatment of T2DM patients with established CVD in Greece.

Indexed as

Benzhydryl CompoundsCardiovascular DiseasesCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2GlucosidesGreeceHumansHypoglycemic AgentsModels, EconomicQuality-Adjusted Life YearsBenzhydryl CompoundsdapagliflozinempagliflozinGlucosidesHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID33687695
OpenAlexW3133870276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.