ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2021
Phytoremediation of potentially toxic elements using constructed wetlands in coastal areas with a mining influence.
Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Situ Use of Mining Substrates for Wetland Construction: Results of a Pilot Experiment.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Special Issue on "Metallophytes for soil remediation" - Preface.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes the use of wetlands as a phytoremediation strategy for areas of mining and maritime influence in the southeast of Spain. Potentially toxic elements (PTEs) tolerant and salinity-resistant macrophytes (Phragmites australis, Juncus effusus and Iris pseudacorus) have been used. The experiment is carried out in an aerobic artificial wetland using representative sediments affected by mining activities in the study area. Selected species were placed in pots containing substrates made with different mixtures of topsoil and/or peat, mining residues (black or yellow sand). After six months, rhizosphere, root and aerial parts were collected. A transfer study of As, Pb, Zn and Cu is performed, determining contents in rhizosphere and plant (aerial and underground part). From these data, the TF and BCF were calculated for each plant in 15 different substrates. The work is complemented by an initial study of scanning electron microscopy (SEM-EDX) of plants. The obtained results indicate a tolerance of the metallophytes to these PTEs, which may favour the obtaining of a naturalized habitat that acts as an effective protective barrier to the ecosystem, that is easy to maintain and that avoid the risk of transfer to the trophic chain. The use of these species can be a complement to the chemical stabilization proposed for the whole area and carried out in experimental plots. Because they are perennial plants, it is necessary to continue with the experiments and obtain results in a longer period of time that allows to evaluate yield and stabilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33687604What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.