Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33687582›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2021

Clinical experience with a shape memory polymer peripheral vascular embolisation plug: a case series.

Robert A Morgan, Ian Loftus, Lakshmi Ratnam, Raj Das, Leto Mailli, Mohamad S Hamady, Kyriakos Lobotesis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Initial Clinical Experience with Shape Memory Polymer Plugs for Various Venous Embolization.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Active aortic aneurysm sac treatment with shape memory polymer during endovascular aneurysm repair.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert A MorganDepartment of Radiology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, GB, UK. Robert.morgan@stgeorges.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8108-5258
Ian LoftusVascular Institute, St. George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, GB, UK.
Lakshmi RatnamDepartment of Radiology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, GB, UK.
Raj DasDepartment of Radiology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, GB, UK.
Leto MailliInterventional Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GB, UK.
Mohamad S HamadyInterventional Radiology, Imperial College-London-St. Mary's Campus, London, GB, UK.
Kyriakos LobotesisNeuroradiology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, GB, UK.
St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBCharing Cross Hospital · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShape memory polymers are materials that are manufactured in a certain shape, can be stored in a temporary deformed shape, and then return to - or remember - their original shape upon exposure to external stimuli such as temperature and moisture. This property lends itself to application in endovascular medical devices. Peripheral vasculature embolisation devices incorporating this novel technology have become commercially available and this case series, where the data were collected as part of a post market registry, outlines initial clinical experience with these novel devices.

resultsEight cases are described in this series. The disease state/conditions for which embolisation was indicated were right common iliac artery aneurysms (n = 3), a type II endoleak into the thoracic aorta following thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (n = 1), a left inferior gluteal artery aneurysm (n = 1), left internal iliac artery aneurysms (n = 2), and a case of splenomegaly, where splenectomy was planned after the embolisation procedure (n = 1). Target arteries were 5-10 mm in diameter. In each case, at least one IMPEDE Embolization Plug (IMP-Device) of an appropriate diameter was used. All procedures were technically successful and target vessel thrombosis was achieved in all cases. Follow-up imaging available during the 45-90-day data collection timeframe showed sustained vessel occlusion. This case series includes examples of situations commonly encountered when embolising the peripheral vasculature, namely, the use of one or multiple devices in a single vessel and in combination with the use of other embolic devices (e.g., microcoils, gelatin sponge, and PVA particles) in the same case. There were no adverse events related to the specific use of the device.

conclusionsThis small series illustrates the safety and efficacy of this novel sponge-based embolic device for the embolisation of small and medium sized arteries and further experience will demonstrate the utility of the shape memory polymer devices.

Indexed as

Peripheral embolisationShape memory polymerVascular plug

Identifiers

PMID33687582
PMCPMC7943681
OpenAlexW3132676842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.