Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33687570›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2021

5K

Darshan D Ruikar, K C Santosh, Ravindra S Hegadi, Lakhan Rupnar, Vivek A Choudhary

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Darshan D Ruikar *Department of Computer Science, P.A.H. Solapur University, Maharashtra, 413255, India.
K C Santosh *KC's PAMI Research Lab, Computer Science, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA. santosh.kc@ieee.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4176-0236
Ravindra S HegadiDepartment of Computer Science, Central University of Karnataka, Karnataka, 585367, India.
Lakhan RupnarRadiology from Radio Diagnosis Department, Dr. VMGMC, Maharashtra, 413255, India.
Vivek A ChoudharyRadio Diagnosis Department, Dr. VMGMC, Maharashtra, 413255, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging techniques widely use Computed Tomography (CT) scans for various purposes, such as screening, diagnosis, and decision-making. Of all, it holds true for bone injuries. To build fully automated Computer-Aided Detection (CADe) and Diagnosis (CADx) tools and techniques, it requires fairly large amount of data (with gold standard). Therefore, in this paper, since state-of-the-art works relied on small dataset, we introduced a CT image dataset on limbs that is designed to understand bone injuries. Our dataset is a collection of 24 patient-specific CT cases having fractures at upper and lower limbs. From upper limbs, 8 cases were collected from bones in/around the shoulder (left and right). Similarly, from lower limbs, 16 cases were collected from knees (left and right). Altogether, 5684 CT images (upper limbs: 2057 and lower limbs: 3627) were collected. Each patient-specific CT case is composed of maximum 257 scans/slices in average. Of all, clinically approved annotations were made on every 10th slices, resulting in 1787 images. Importantly, no fractured limbs were missed in our annotation. Besides, to avoid privacy and confidential issues, patient-related information were deleted. The proposed dataset could be a promising resource for the medical imaging research community, where imaging techniques are employed for various purposes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time 5K

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansRadiographyAnd OrthopedicComputer-Aided detectionComputer-Aided diagnosisCT scansFractured limbsMedical imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.