Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33687563›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2021

Mortality after cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a medical ICU : A sex-specific outcome analysis.

Richard Rezar, Bernhard Wernly, Michael Haslinger, Clemens Seelmaier, Philipp Schwaiger, Ingrid Pretsch, Maria Eisl, Christian Jung, Uta C Hoppe, Michael Lichtenauer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard RezarClinic of Internal Medicine II, Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. r.rezar@salk.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7118-501X
Bernhard WernlyClinic of Internal Medicine II, Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Michael HaslingerClinic of Internal Medicine II, Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Clemens SeelmaierClinic of Internal Medicine II, Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Philipp SchwaigerClinic of Internal Medicine II, Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Ingrid PretschClinic of Internal Medicine II, Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Maria EislClinic of Internal Medicine II, Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Christian JungDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Uta C HoppeClinic of Internal Medicine II, Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Michael LichtenauerClinic of Internal Medicine II, Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
University of Salzburg · ATHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerforming cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and postresuscitation care in the intensive care unit (ICU) are standardized procedures; however, there is evidence suggesting sex-dependent differences in clinical management and outcome variables after cardiac arrest (CA).

methodsA prospective analysis of patients who were hospitalized at a medical ICU after CPR between December 2018 and March 2020 was conducted. Exclusion criteria were age < 18 years, hospital length of stay < 24 h and traumatic CA. The primary study endpoint was mortality after 6 months and the secondary endpoint neurological outcome assessed by cerebral performance category (CPC). Differences between groups were calculated by using U‑tests and χ

resultsA total of 106 patients were included and the majority were male (71.7%). No statistically significant difference regarding 6‑month mortality between sexes could be shown (hazard risk, HR 0.68, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.35-1.34; p = 0.27). Neurological outcome was also similar between both groups (CPC 1 88% in both sexes after 6 months; p = 1.000). There were no statistically significant differences regarding general characteristics, pre-existing diseases, as well as the majority of clinical and laboratory parameters or measures performed on the ICU.

conclusionIn a single center CPR database no statistically significant sex-specific differences regarding post-resuscitation care, survival and neurological outcome after 6 months were observed.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesHeart ArrestAdultFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleProspective StudiesSurvival AnalysisCardiac arrestCPROutcomeResuscitationSex

Identifiers

PMID33687563
PMCPMC8116269
OpenAlexW3133707643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.