Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33687541›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2021

Mental health status of health sector and community services employees during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Esma Kabasakal, Funda Özpulat, Ayşegül Akca, L Hilal Özcebe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mental Health and Well-Being Needs among Non-Health Essential Workers during Recent Epidemics and Pandemics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictors of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Brazil during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Esma KabasakalDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9305-4363
Funda ÖzpulatDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-3665
Ayşegül AkcaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey. aysegulakca2014@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5998-7466
L Hilal ÖzcebePublic Health, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0918-8519
Ankara University · TRAnkara Yıldırım Beyazıt University · TRHacettepe University · TRSelçuk University · TR

Funding

Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Scientific Research Project ID:2109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was conducted to evaluate the depression, anxiety and stress status of health sector and community service workers who were actively working during the pandemic period.

methodsThis is a descriptive study. A total of 735 people consisting of 426 health sector employees and 309 service sector employees, constituted the study sample. In this study, the data were collected using the personal information form and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21). A regression model was established to test the effect of socio-demographic characteristics on depression, anxiety, and stress levels during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsWhile there was no difference in working a second job across different sectors (p = 0.450), the household income (p < 0.001) and the increase in expenditures during the COVID-19 pandemic (p < 0.001) were different across the sectors. The scores of the overall scale and its sub-dimensions were significantly different across the sectors (p < 0.001). The DASS-21 scores were higher in the participants, who started to smoke more and who had their sleep duration decreased (p < 0.001). There is a statistically significant difference between social media use and the DASS-21 score (p < 0.001). There is a significant difference across all DASS-21 subgroups by the daily working hours in the health sector (p < 0.001).

conclusionOur study provides significant findings regarding the mental health of individuals who continued working during the pandemic. To implement effective mental health interventions to risk groups and affected people in the COVID-19 pandemic, the recommendations of leading organizations, including WHO and ILO, should be implemented effectively concerning occupational health.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdolescentAdultAnxietyCOVID-19DepressionFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupationsPandemicsSleepSocial WelfareStress, PsychologicalCommunity services employeeCOVID-19Health sector employeeMental healthOccupational health

Identifiers

PMID33687541
PMCPMC7941118
OpenAlexW3135732845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.