Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33687476›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2021

Emmetropic, But Not Myopic Human Eyes Distinguish Positive Defocus From Calculated Blur.

Barbara Swiatczak, Frank Schaeffel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Sustained Plus Lens Defocus Alters Retinal Responses and Ciliary Muscle Morphology In Myopes and Near-emmetropes.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  4. Mesopic Illumination in Natural Environments: Implications for Myopia Research.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of Myopia Control Spectacles on Retinal Image Contrast.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  10. S-Cone Retinal Pathway Dysfunction in Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Optical and Visual Diet in Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  15. Is central vision (and a fovea) needed for emmetropisation?Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara SwiatczakInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel (IOB), Basel, Switzerland.
Frank SchaeffelInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel (IOB), Basel, Switzerland.
Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel · CHSTZ eyetrial · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Defocus blur imposed by positive lenses can induce hyperopia, whereas blur imposed by diffusers induces deprivation myopia. It is unclear whether the retina can distinguish between both conditions when the magnitude of blur is matched. Methods: Ten emmetropic (average 0.0 ± 0.3 diopters [D]) and 10 subjects with myopia (-2.7 ± 0.9 D; 24 ± 4 years) watched a movie on a large screen (65 inches at 2 meters (m) distance. The movie was presented either unfiltered ("control"), with calculated low-pass filtering equivalent to a defocus of 2.5 D, or with binocular real optical defocus of +2.5 D. Spatial filtering was done in real-time by software written in Visual C++. Axial length was followed with the Lenstar LS-900 with autopositioning system. Results: Watching unfiltered movies ("control") caused no changes in axial length. In emmetropes, watching movies with calculated defocus caused axial eye elongation (+9.8 ± 7.6 µm) while watching movies with real positive defocus caused shorter eyes (-8.8 ± 9.2 µm; difference between both P < 0.0001). In addition, in myopes, calculated defocus caused longer eyes (+8.4 ± 9.0 µm, P = 0.001). Strikingly, myopic eyes became also longer with positive defocus (+9.1 ± 11.2 µm, P = 0.02). The difference between emmetropic and myopic eyes was highly significant (-8.8 ± 9.2 µm vs. +9.1 ± 11.2 µm, respectively, P = 0.001). Conclusions: (1) In emmetropic human subjects, the retina is able to distinguish between real positive defocus and calculated defocus even when the modulation transfer function was matched, (2) in myopic eyes, the retina no longer distinguishes between both conditions because the eyes became longer in both cases. Results suggest that the retina in a myopic eye has reduced ability to detect positive defocus.

Indexed as

AdultAxial Length, EyeBiometryEmmetropiaFemaleHumansInterferometryMaleMyopiaRefraction, OcularRetinaVision, BinocularYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33687476
PMCPMC7960797
OpenAlexW3134901620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.