ArticleeLife2021
Visuomotor learning from postdictive motor error.
Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global spatial errors and local feature errors drive oculomotor learning.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Dissociating the behavioral and computational features of implicit motor learning and explicit perturbation detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Actions as perceptual experiments.Journal of vision · 2026Review
- Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- High-fidelity but hypometric spatial localization of afterimages across saccades.Science advances · 2026Article
- Predictive remapping and allocentric coding as consequences of energy efficiency in recurrent neural network models of active vision.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Early visual signatures and benefits of intra-saccadic motion streaks.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Causal inference, prediction and state estimation in sensorimotor learning.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Adaptation across the 2D population code explains the spatially distributive nature of motor learning.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Consequences of eye movements for spatial selectivity.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Oculomotor behavior can be adjusted on the basis of artificial feedback signals indicating externally caused errors.PloS one · 2024Article
- Altered oculomotor flexibility is linked to high autistic traits.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A triple distinction of cerebellar function for oculomotor learning and fatigue compensation.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Adaptive changes to saccade amplitude and target localization do not require pre-saccadic target visibility.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Decoding Trans-Saccadic Prediction Error.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Motor recalibration of visual and saccadic maps.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Interaction of dynamic error signals in saccade adaptation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Mislocalization after inhibition of saccadic adaptation.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Error inconsistency does not generally inhibit saccadic adaptation: Support for linear models of multi-gainfield adaptation.Physiological reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensorimotor learning adapts motor output to maintain movement accuracy. For saccadic eye movements, learning also alters space perception, suggesting a dissociation between the performed saccade and its internal representation derived from corollary discharge (CD). This is critical since learning is commonly believed to be driven by CD-based visual prediction error. We estimate the internal saccade representation through pre- and trans-saccadic target localization, showing that it decouples from the actual saccade during learning. We present a model that explains motor and perceptual changes by collective plasticity of spatial target percept, motor command, and a forward dynamics model that transforms CD from motor into visuospatial coordinates. We show that learning does not follow visual prediction error but instead a postdictive update of space after saccade landing. We conclude that trans-saccadic space perception guides motor learning via CD-based postdiction of motor error under the assumption of a stable world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.