ArticleInternational journal of fertility & sterility2021
Factors Associated with In Vitro Fertilization Live Birth Outcome: A Comparison of Different Classification Methods.
Article in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in polycystic ovarian syndrome management: past, present, and future.La Radiologia medica · 2025Pooled it
- Women's perspectives regarding in vitro fertilization as a conception option at the primary healthcare level in Ekiti State.Research in health services & regions · 2026Article
- Changes in ambient environmental conditions correspond to variations inFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Does Developmental Timing Matter? Comparative Analysis of Day 5 and Day 6 Euploid Blastocyst Transfers in Recurrent Implantation Failure Patients.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- The Influence of Pre-IVF Day 2 TSH Levels on Treatment Success and Obstetric Outcomes: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis with Machine Learning-Based Data Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Transcriptome profiling of aged-mice ovaries administered with individual ingredients of Samul-tang.Scientific data · 2025Article
- The use of artificial intelligence in sexual and reproductive health: a comprehensive scoping review.npj women's health · 2025Article
- Machine learning in predicting infertility treatment success: A systematic literature review of techniques.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Review
- Enhancing outcomes in IVF laboratories: navigating the human element through leadership and emotional intelligence.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- The Role of the Endometrium in Implantation: A Modern View.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Predict Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes in In Vitro Fertilization: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Evaluation of telomere length and telomerase activity on predicting in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Review
- Chitosan alleviates ovarian aging by enhancing macrophage phagocyte-mediated tissue homeostasis.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2024Article
- Comparative study of machine learning approaches integrated with genetic algorithm for IVF success prediction.PloS one · 2024Article
- Lovastatin, an Up-Regulator of Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor, Enhances Follicular Development in Mouse Ovaries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Single-cell RNA-sequencing of retrieved human oocytes and eggs in clinical practice and for human ovarian cell atlasing.Molecular reproduction and development · 2022Review
- Limited Effects of Ultra-low Oxygen Concentration during Extended Embryo Culture onJournal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
- Improving Fertility Treatment Documentation - A Survey.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMATERIALS AND
methodsThis historical cohort study was conducted in a referral infertility centre located in Tehran, Iran. The patients' demographic and clinical variables for 6071 cycles during March 21, 2011 to March 20, 2014 were collected. We used six different machine learning approaches including support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), naïve Bayes (NB), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to predict successful delivery. The results of the performed methods were compared using accuracy tools.
resultsThe rate of successful delivery was 81.2% among 4930 cycles. The total accuracy of the results exposed RF had the best performance among the six approaches (ACC=0.81). Regarding the importance of variables, total number of embryos, number of injected oocytes, cause of infertility, female age, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) were the most important factors predicting successful delivery.
conclusionA successful delivery following IVF in infertile individuals is considerably affected by the number of embryos, number of injected oocytes, cause of infertility, female age, and PCOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.