ArticleKorean journal of radiology2021
Regional Amyloid Burden Differences Evaluated Using Quantitative Cardiac MRI in Patients with Cardiac Amyloidosis.
Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Performance of Relative Apical Sparing Across Cardiac Diseases: A Multimodality Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Asia: 2025 Status Update.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Advances in imaging-based diagnosis, prognosis, and response assessment in cardiac amyloidosis: a comprehensive multimodality review.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Myocardial Strain Parameters Derived from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking Technique in Light-Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis Patients: A Pilot Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Echocardiographic red flags of ATTR cardiomyopathy a single centre validation.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Article
- Clinical and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Cardiac Amyloidosis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Differential Diagnosis of Thick Myocardium according to Histologic Features Revealed by Multiparametric Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Korean journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Multimodality Imaging in the Evaluation and Prognostication of Cardiac Amyloidosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the regional amyloid burden and myocardial deformation using T1 mapping and strain values in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) according to late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) patterns. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty patients with CA were divided into 2 groups per LGE pattern, and 15 healthy subjects were enrolled. Global and regional native T1 and T2 mapping, extracellular volume (ECV), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-feature tracking strain values were compared in an intergroup and interregional manner.
resultsOf the patients with CA, 32 had diffuse global LGE (group 2), and 8 had focal patchy or no LGE (group 1). Global native T1, T2, and ECV were significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 than in the control group (native T1: 1384.4 ms vs. 1466.8 ms vs. 1230.5 ms; T2: 53.8 ms vs. 54.2 ms vs. 48.9 ms; and ECV: 36.9% vs. 51.4% vs. 26.0%, respectively; all,
conclusionQuantitative T1 mapping parameters such as native T1 and ECV may help diagnose early CA. ECV, in particular, can reflect regional differences in the amyloid deposition in patients with advanced CA, and increased basal ECV is related to decreased basal strain. Therefore, quantitative CMR parameters may help diagnose CA and determine its severity in patients with or without LGE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.