Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33686788›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2021

A comparative study of the effect of the Time for Dementia programme on medical students.

Sube Banerjee, Christopher Jones, Juliet Wright, Wendy Grosvenor, Molly Hebditch, Leila Hughes, Yvonne Feeney, Nicolas Farina, Sophie Mackrell, Ramin Nilforooshan and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Experiences of Dietetic Students Taking Part in an Online Longitudinal Dementia Educational Programme: A Qualitative Study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sube BanerjeeFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8083-7649
Christopher JonesCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Juliet WrightCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Wendy GrosvenorSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5529-7022
Molly HebditchCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Leila HughesCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Yvonne FeeneyCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Nicolas FarinaCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0635-2547
Sophie MackrellTime for Dementia Programme, Alzheimer's Society, Horsham, UK.
Ramin NilforooshanSurrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9801-183X
Chris FoxNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK.
Stephen BremnerCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Stephanie DaleyCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5842-0492
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GBAlzheimer's Society · GBSurrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional healthcare education typically focuses on short block clinical placements based on acute care, investigations and technical aspects of diagnosis and treatment. It may therefore fail to build the understanding, compassion and person-centred empathy needed to help those with long-term conditions, like dementia. Time for Dementia was developed to address this.

methodParallel group comparison of two cohorts of UK medical students from universities, one participating in Time for Dementia (intervention group) and one not (control group). In Time for Dementia students visit a person with dementia and their family in pairs for 2 hours three times a year for 2 years, the control group received their normal curriculum.

resultsIn an adjusted multilevel model (intervention group n = 274, control n = 112), there was strong evidence supporting improvements for Time for Dementia participants in: total Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire score (coefficient: 2.19, p = 0.003) and its person-centredness subscale (1.32, p = 0.006) and weaker evidence in its hopefulness subscale (0.78, p = 0.070). There was also strong evidence of improvement in the Dementia Knowledge Questionnaire (1.63, p < 0.001) and Dementia Attitudes Scale (total score: 6.55, p < 0.001; social comfort subscale: 4.15, p < 0.001; dementia knowledge subscale: 3.38, p = 0.001) scores. No differences were observed on the Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Scale, the Medical Condition Regard Scale or the Jefferson Scale of Empathy. DISCUSSION: Time for Dementia may help improve the attitudes of medical students towards dementia promoting a person-centred approach and increasing social comfort. Such patient-focused programmes may be a useful complement to traditional medical education.

Indexed as

DementiaStudents, MedicalCurriculumDelivery of Health CareHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAlzheimer's diseasedementiahealthcare educationLongitudinal Integrated Clerkshipslong-term conditionsmultimorbiditysenior mentorship programs

Identifiers

PMID33686788
PMCPMC9291285
OpenAlexW3135077156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.