Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33686475›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

The utility of 2-[

Ronnie Sebro, S Sharon Ashok

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ronnie SebroDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. rsebro@gmail.com.
S Sharon AshokDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Genomic analysis of bipolar disorder in a genetic isolateR01MH093415 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BUCAN, MAJA · 2011 to 2014
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093415NIMH NIH HHS R21 NIH/NIMH MH093415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to compare the accuracy of PET/CT parameters with CT parameters for directing bone biopsies.

methodsThe study was an IRB-approved retrospective study of 388 patients who underwent both 2-[

resultsWe reviewed the data from 388 patients. Of these, 295 patients had bone lesion biopsies, and 93 patients had bone marrow aspirations/biopsies. Biopsies of larger bone lesions (p = 0.033) and bone lesions with higher SUV

conclusionsMetabolic 2-[ KEY POINTS: • The 2-[

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyBiopsy, Fine-NeedleHumansPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsBiopsiesBone marrow biopsiesNeoplasmsPositron emission tomography computed tomographySensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

PMID33686475
OpenAlexW3135119632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.