Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33686467›Full record

Observational studyFamilial cancer2021

Clinical value of a screening tool for tumor predisposition syndromes in childhood cancer patients (TuPS): a prospective, observational, multi-center study.

Floor A M Postema, Saskia M J Hopman, Corianne A J M de Borgie, Cora M Aalfs, Jakob K Anninga, Lieke P V Berger, Fonnet E Bleeker, Charlotte J Dommering, Natasha K A van Eijkelenburg, Peter Hammond and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Familial cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Floor A M PostemaDepartment of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2711-0560
Saskia M J HopmanDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Corianne A J M de BorgieClinical Research Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cora M AalfsDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jakob K AnningaPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lieke P V BergerDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Fonnet E BleekerDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charlotte J DommeringDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Natasha K A van EijkelenburgPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter HammondNuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Marry M van den Heuvel-EibrinkPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Janna A HolPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wijnanda A KorsPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tom G W LetteboerDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan L C M LoeffenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lisethe MeijerPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maran J W Olderode-BerendsDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anja WagnerDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Raoul C Hennekam *Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes H M Merks *Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.h.m.merks@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl.
Princess Máxima Center · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLErasmus MC · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognizing a tumor predisposition syndrome (TPS) in a child with cancer is of clinical relevance. Earlier we developed a screening tool to increase diagnostic accuracy and clinical efficiency of identifying TPSs in children with cancer. Here we report on the value of this tool in clinical practice. TuPS is a prospective, observational, multi-center study including children newly diagnosed with cancer from 2016 to 2019 in the Netherlands. Children in whom a TPS had been diagnosed before the cancer diagnosis were excluded. The screening tool consists of a checklist, 2D and 3D photographic series and digital assessment of these by a clinical geneticist. If a TPS was suspected, the patient was assessed positive and referred for routine genetic consultation. Primary aim was to assess the clinical value of this new screening tool. Of the 363 included patients, 57% (208/363) were assessed positive. In 15% of patients (32/208), the 2D photographic series with (n = 12) or without (n = 20) 3D photographs were decisive in the positive assessment. In 2% (4/208) of positive assessed patients, a TPS was diagnosed, and in an additional 2% (4/208) a germline variant of uncertain significance was found. Thirty-five negatively assessed patients were evaluated through routine genetic consultation as controls, in none a TPS was detected. Using the screening tool, 57% of the patients were assessed as suspected for having a TPS. No false negative results were identified in the negative control group in the clinical care setting. The observed prevalence of TPS was lower than expected, due to selection bias in the cohort.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsChildEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningProspective StudiesSyndromeGenetic predisposition to diseaseGenetic screeningImagingNeoplasmsPediatricsThree-dimensional

Identifiers

PMID33686467
PMCPMC8484098
OpenAlexW3135584061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.