ArticleGenetics2021
Why are rare variants hard to impute? Coalescent models reveal theoretical limits in existing algorithms.
Article in Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scalable medium-density genotyping platforms for cultivar identification, pedigree authentication, marker-assisted and genomic selection, and other applications in strawberry.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- ALGI: Sparse Convolutional Denoising Autoencoder Utilizing Local Genomic Information for Genotype Imputation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Optimal Reference Panel Design in Ancient DNA Imputation from Coalescent Theory, Simulation, and Real Data Application with an Ancient Reference Panel.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Advances in haplotype phasing and genotype imputation.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Exome-Wide Analysis Identifies a RareKidney international reports · 2026Article
- High-quality Population-specific Haplotype-resolved Reference Panel in the Genomic and Pangenomic Eras.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Using the ancestral recombination graph to study the history of rare variants in founder populations.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Linking epidemiology and genomics of maternal smoking during pregnancy in utero and in ageing: a population-based study using human foetuses and the UK Biobank cohort.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Whole-genome sequencing identifies variants in ANK1, LRRN1, HAS1, and other genes and regulatory regions for stroke in type 1 diabetes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The first clinical validation of whole-genome screening on standard trophectoderm biopsies of preimplantation embryos.F&S reports · 2024Article
- Recent advances in polygenic scores: translation, equitability, methods and FAIR tools.Genome medicine · 2024Review
- Whole Genome Sequencing Identifies Novel Common and Low-Frequency Variants Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Unravelling the genetic architecture of human complex traits through whole genome sequencing.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Biobank-scale inference of ancestral recombination graphs enables genealogical analysis of complex traits.Nature genetics · 2023Article
- Genetic and epigenetic background of diabetic kidney disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genotype imputation is an indispensable step in human genetic studies. Large reference panels with deeply sequenced genomes now allow interrogating variants with minor allele frequency < 1% without sequencing. Although it is critical to consider limits of this approach, imputation methods for rare variants have only done so empirically; the theoretical basis of their imputation accuracy has not been explored. To provide theoretical consideration of imputation accuracy under the current imputation framework, we develop a coalescent model of imputing rare variants, leveraging the joint genealogy of the sample to be imputed and reference individuals. We show that broadly used imputation algorithms include model misspecifications about this joint genealogy that limit the ability to correctly impute rare variants. We develop closed-form solutions for the probability distribution of this joint genealogy and quantify the inevitable error rate resulting from the model misspecification across a range of allele frequencies and reference sample sizes. We show that the probability of a falsely imputed minor allele decreases with reference sample size, but the proportion of falsely imputed minor alleles mostly depends on the allele count in the reference sample. We summarize the impact of this error on genotype imputation on association tests by calculating the r2 between imputed and true genotype and show that even when modeling other sources of error, the impact of the model misspecification has a significant impact on the r2 of rare variants. To evaluate these predictions in practice, we compare the imputation of the same dataset across imputation panels of different sizes. Although this empirical imputation accuracy is substantially lower than our theoretical prediction, modeling misspecification seems to further decrease imputation accuracy for variants with low allele counts in the reference. These results provide a framework for developing new imputation algorithms and for interpreting rare variant association analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.