Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33686239›Full record

ArticleOncogene2021

SMAD4 loss limits the vulnerability of pancreatic cancer cells to complex I inhibition via promotion of mitophagy.

Zuzana Ezrova, Zuzana Nahacka, Jan Stursa, Lukas Werner, Erik Vlcak, Petra Kralova Viziova, Michael V Berridge, Radislav Sedlacek, Renata Zobalova, Jakub Rohlena and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Editorial: The effects of mitochondrial dysfunction on the cell cycle.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Clinical and Molecular Attributes and Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasm.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Zuzana EzrovaInstitute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Prague-West, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4174-6066
Zuzana NahackaInstitute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Prague-West, Czech Republic.
Jan StursaInstitute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Prague-West, Czech Republic.
Lukas WernerInstitute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Prague-West, Czech Republic.
Erik VlcakInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petra Kralova ViziovaCzech Centre of Phenogenomics, Institute of Molecular Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Prague-West, Czech Republic.
Michael V BerridgeMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Radislav SedlacekCzech Centre of Phenogenomics, Institute of Molecular Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Prague-West, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-392X
Renata ZobalovaInstitute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Prague-West, Czech Republic.
Jakub RohlenaInstitute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Prague-West, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5427-6502
Stepana BoukalovaInstitute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Prague-West, Czech Republic. stepana.boukalova@ibt.cas.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6478-4604
Jiri NeuzilInstitute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Prague-West, Czech Republic. j.neuzil@griffith.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-2460
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biotechnology · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZCharles University · CZGriffith University · AUMalaghan Institute of Medical Research · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest forms of cancer, which is attributed to lack of effective treatment options and drug resistance. Mitochondrial inhibitors have emerged as a promising class of anticancer drugs, and several inhibitors of the electron transport chain (ETC) are being clinically evaluated. We hypothesized that resistance to ETC inhibitors from the biguanide class could be induced by inactivation of SMAD4, an important tumor suppressor involved in transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signaling, and associated with altered mitochondrial activity. Here we show that, paradoxically, both TGFβ-treatment and the loss of SMAD4, a downstream member of TGFβ signaling cascade, induce resistance to biguanides, decrease mitochondrial respiration, and fragment the mitochondrial network. Mechanistically, the resistance of SMAD4-deficient cells is mediated by increased mitophagic flux driven by MAPK/ERK signaling, whereas TGFβ-induced resistance is autophagy-independent and linked to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Interestingly, mitochondria-targeted tamoxifen, a complex I inhibitor under clinical trial, overcomes resistance mediated by SMAD4-deficiency or TGFβ signaling. Our data point to differential mechanisms underlying the resistance to treatment in PDAC arising from TGFβ signaling and SMAD4 loss, respectively. The findings will help the development of mitochondria-targeted therapy for pancreatic cancer patients with SMAD4 as a plausible predictive marker.

Indexed as

HumansMitophagyPancreatic NeoplasmsSignal TransductionSmad4 ProteinSmad4 ProteinSMAD4 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33686239
OpenAlexW3134213990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.