ArticleScientific reports2021
Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Crafting a prognostic nomogram for the overall survival rate of cutaneous verrucous carcinoma using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Trial
- Prognosis of the Keratinizing Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database.International journal of clinical practice · 2023Trial
- Development and validation of tumor-size-stratified prognostic nomograms for patients with uterine sarcoma: A SEER database analysis.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Development and validation of a SEER-derived prognostic nomogram for non-metastatic Asian breast cancer patients.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a SEER-based prognostic nomogram for overall survival in elderly Asian American women with breast cancer.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Five-year longitudinal changes in social, economic, and psychosocial wellbeing among young women with breast cancer in Mexico.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Exploring the Impact of Gender and Income on Concerns Reported by Cancer Survivors Aged ≥85 Years in Canada: A Secondary Analysis of the Canadian Transitions Survey.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- The impact of anxiety and affective disorders on breast cancer screening in women in Puerto Rico.PloS one · 2026Article
- Worse survival despite indolent features for triple-negative invasive lobular carcinoma: a Swedish nationwide registry-based study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Clinician documentation of social circumstances of older and younger women receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer.The oncologist · 2025Article
- A scoping review of web-based, interactive, personalized decision-making tools available to support breast cancer treatment and survivorship care.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Inequality in Female Breast Cancer Relative Survival Rates between White and Black Women in the United States.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Risk factors of breast cancer patients developing multiple primary cancers: a retrospective study and establishing/testing of machine learning models.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Predictors of survival rates among breast cancer patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2024.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Temporal trend and spatial analysis of breast cancer mortality in Paraná, 2012-2021.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025Article
- Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Risk Factors, and Primary Treatment for Elderly Patients with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Seer Database-Based Research.Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy · 2025Article
- Development and validation of novel machine learning-based prognostic models and propensity score matching for comparison of surgical approaches in mucinous breast cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Five-year overall and specific survival of breast cancer in great Cuiaba (MT), Brazil.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Danish Cancer Survivors Referred to a Late Effects Clinic: A Prospective Cohort Study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024Article
- Allostatic load as a predictor of postoperative complications in patients with breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marital status proved to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with breast cancer. We therefore strove to explore the impact of dynamic changes in marital status on the prognosis of breast cancer patients. We selected patients meeting the eligibility criteria from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer database. We then used multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model to analyze the effect of dynamic changes in marital status on the prognosis of overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific special survival (BCSS). Compared with the patients in the Single-Single group and the divorced/separated/widowed-divorced/separated/widowed (DSW-DSW) group, patients in the Married-Married group were significantly associated with better BCSS (HR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.19, P < 0.001; HR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.14-1.25, P < 0.001, respectively) and OS (HR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.20-1.30, P < 0.001; HR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.45-1.54, P < 0.001, respectively). In contrast to the DSW-DSW group, the Single-Single group and the DSW-Married group showed similar BCSS (HR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.92-1.05, P = 0.660; HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97-1.15, P = 0.193, respectively) but better OS (HR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09-1.19, P < 0.001; HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.25-1.40, P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with the Single-Single group, the Single-Married group showed significantly better BCSS (HR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07-1.36, P = 0.003) but no difference in OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.98-1.18, P = 0.102); In contrast to the Married-DSW group, the Married-Married group exhibited better BCSS (HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.05-1.18, P < 0.001) and OS (HR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.22-1.32, P < 0.001). Our study demonstrated that, regardless of their previous marital status, married patients had a better prognosis than unmarried patients. Moreover, single patients obtained better survival outcomes than DSW patients. Therefore, it is necessary to proactively provide single and DSW individuals with appropriate social and psychological support that would benefit them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.