Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33686216›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Brain pathology recapitulates physiology: A network meta-analysis.

Thomas J Vanasse, Peter T Fox, P Mickle Fox, Franco Cauda, Tommaso Costa, Stephen M Smith, Simon B Eickhoff, Jack L Lancaster

Abstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A co-alteration parceling of the cingulate cortex.Brain structure & function · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Sex-Specific Associations of Irritability With Subcortical Brain Volumes.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Modeling NeurodegenerationFrontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas J Vanasse *Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4672-0049
Peter T Fox *Research Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. fox@uthscsa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0465-2028
P Mickle FoxResearch Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4997-0003
Franco CaudaFocusLab and GCS-fMRI, University of Turin and Koelliker Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Tommaso CostaFocusLab and GCS-fMRI, University of Turin and Koelliker Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Stephen M SmithWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN FMRIB), Oxford University, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8166-069X
Simon B EickhoffInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jack L LancasterResearch Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

Meta-anaylsis in human brain mappingR01MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2006 to 2024
$10.5M
Meta-analysis in human brain mappingR56MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2020 to 2020
$543k
Novel fMRI Strategy to Assess Consciousness in Brain-Injured PatientsF32NS114034 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI VANASSE, THOMAS J · 2019 to 2021
$181k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074457NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH074457NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS114034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network architecture is a brain-organizational motif present across spatial scales from cell assemblies to distributed systems. Structural pathology in some neurodegenerative disorders selectively afflicts a subset of functional networks, motivating the network degeneration hypothesis (NDH). Recent evidence suggests that structural pathology recapitulating physiology may be a general property of neuropsychiatric disorders. To test this possibility, we compared functional and structural network meta-analyses drawing upon the BrainMap database. The functional meta-analysis included results from >7,000 experiments of subjects performing >100 task paradigms; the structural meta-analysis included >2,000 experiments of patients with >40 brain disorders. Structure-function network concordance was high: 68% of networks matched (pFWE < 0.01), confirming the broader scope of NDH. This correspondence persisted across higher model orders. A positive linear association between disease and behavioral entropy (p = 0.0006;R

Indexed as

Nerve DegenerationBrainBrain MappingCase-Control StudiesHumansMental DisordersNerve NetNeurodegenerative Diseases

Identifiers

PMID33686216
PMCPMC7940476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.