Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33686212›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2021

Automated identification of clinical features from sparsely annotated 3-dimensional medical imaging.

Nadav Rakocz, Jeffrey N Chiang, Muneeswar G Nittala, Giulia Corradetti, Liran Tiosano, Swetha Velaga, Michael Thompson, Brian L Hill, Sriram Sankararaman, Jonathan L Haines and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A deep learning model for automated identification of age-related macular degeneration atrophy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Robust AMD Stage Grading with Exclusively OCTA Modality Leveraging 3D Volume.... IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision workshops. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nadav RakoczDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5437-9691
Jeffrey N ChiangDepartment of Computational Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6843-1355
Muneeswar G NittalaDoheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Giulia CorradettiDoheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Liran TiosanoDoheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Swetha VelagaDoheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michael ThompsonDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Brian L HillDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-5770
Sriram SankararamanDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1586-9641
Jonathan L HainesDepartment of Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Margaret A Pericak-VanceJohn P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Dwight StambolianDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Srinivas R Sadda *Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eran Halperin *Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. ehalperin@cs.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2373-3691

Funding

Genetic Epidemiology of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Older Order AmishR01EY023164 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PERICAK-VANCE, MARGARET A., STAMBOLIAN, DWIGHT EDWARD · 2013 to 2017
$6.2M
Methods for Genomic Analysis in Heterogeneous TissuesR01HG010505 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HALPERIN, ERAN · 2019 to 2022
$2.6M
Statistical Models for Dissecting Human Population Admixture and its Role in Evolution and DiseaseR35GM125055 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SANKARARAMAN, SRIRAM · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023164NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010505NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM125055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the core challenges in applying machine learning and artificial intelligence to medicine is the limited availability of annotated medical data. Unlike in other applications of machine learning, where an abundance of labeled data is available, the labeling and annotation of medical data and images require a major effort of manual work by expert clinicians who do not have the time to annotate manually. In this work, we propose a new deep learning technique (SLIVER-net), to predict clinical features from 3-dimensional volumes using a limited number of manually annotated examples. SLIVER-net is based on transfer learning, where we borrow information about the structure and parameters of the network from publicly available large datasets. Since public volume data are scarce, we use 2D images and account for the 3-dimensional structure using a novel deep learning method which tiles the volume scans, and then adds layers that leverage the 3D structure. In order to illustrate its utility, we apply SLIVER-net to predict risk factors for progression of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a leading cause of blindness, from optical coherence tomography (OCT) volumes acquired from multiple sites. SLIVER-net successfully predicts these factors despite being trained with a relatively small number of annotated volumes (hundreds) and only dozens of positive training examples. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that SLIVER-net significantly outperforms standard state-of-the-art deep learning techniques used for medical volumes, and its performance is generalizable as it was validated on an external testing set. In a direct comparison with a clinician panel, we find that SLIVER-net also outperforms junior specialists, and identifies AMD progression risk factors similarly to expert retina specialists.

Identifiers

PMID33686212
PMCPMC7940637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.