ArticleJournal of human hypertension2022
Prognostic significance of hypertension at the onset of lupus nephritis in Chinese patients: prevalence and clinical outcomes.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kidney Biopsy and Prognosis in Lupus Nephritis: Histological Predictors of Renal Outcome-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Sex differences in mortality among patients with lupus nephritis.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Underlying Mechanisms and Treatment of Hypertension in Glomerular Diseases.Current hypertension reports · 2024Review
- Risk factors for mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Analysis of adult and pediatric cohorts in Taiwan.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022Article
- Treatment of Lupus Nephritis from Iranian Traditional Medicine and Modern Medicine Points of View: A Comparative Study.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Review
- Cardiometabolic Risk, Evaluation, and Control in Lupus Nephritis.Glomerular diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The demographic features, and clinical and histological characteristics of lupus nephritis (LN) patients with hypertension in the Chinese population remain unclear. Hence, the clinical characteristics of LN with and without hypertension were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 764 LN patients (53.1%) were hypertensive. These hypertensive patients had higher levels of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rates, when compared to their normotensive counterparts (P < 0.05). Furthermore, these hypertensive patients had higher median acuity index and chronicity index scores, when compared to normotensives (P < 0.001). In terms of histology, hypertensive patients were more likely to develop glomerular sclerosis, thickened glomerular capillary loops, or crescent formations, and had more severe endothelial cell proliferation, when compared to normotensive patients (P < 0.001). Hypertensive patients also had a higher percentage for more severe tubular atrophy, interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration and interstitial fibrosis (P < 0.001). Compared with normotensive patients, hypertensive patients exhibited a significant decline in survival time and rate for all end points (P < 0.01). The presence of hypertension was an independent predictor of mortality (P = 0.009), ESRD (P = 0.026), and doubling of serum creatinine (P = 0.017). In conclusion, hypertension is associated with poor clinical and renal outcome in LN patients. The monitoring and control of hypertension should be considered an important clinical goal in the treatment of LN patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33686211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.