Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33686151›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

Adequacy of early-stage breast cancer systemic adjuvant treatment to Saint Gallen-2013 statement: the MCC-Spain study.

Inés Gómez-Acebo, Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos, Mónica Mirones, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez, Marcela Guevara, Pilar Amiano, Maria Sala, Antonio J Molina, Jéssica Alonso-Molero, Victor Moreno and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Patient Characteristics Associated with Intended Nonguideline Chemotherapy in Women with Stage I to IIIA Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Inés Gómez-AceboCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. ines.gomez@unican.es.
Trinidad Dierssen-SotosCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Mónica MironesUniversidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Beatriz Pérez-GómezCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Marcela GuevaraCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Pilar AmianoCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Maria SalaDepartment of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio J MolinaGrupo de Investigación en Interacción Gen-Ambiente-Salud (GIIGAS), Instituto de Biomedicina (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Jéssica Alonso-MoleroUniversidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Victor MorenoCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Claudia Suarez-CallejaCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Ana Molina-BarcelóCancer and Public Health Area, FISABIO-Public Health, Valencia, Spain.
Juan AlguacilCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Rafael Marcos-GrageraCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
María Fernández-OrtizIDIVAL, Santander, Spain.
Oscar Sanz-GuadarramaServicio de Cirugía General, Unidad de Mama, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain.
Gemma Castaño-VinyalsCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Leire Gil-MajueloPublic Health Division of Gipuzkoa, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Ministry of Health of the Basque Government, San Sebastian, Spain.
Conchi Moreno-IribasNavarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain.
Nuria AragonésCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Manolis KogevinasCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Marina PollánCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Javier LlorcaCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla · ESUniversidad de Cantabria · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESInstituto de Salud Pública de Navarra · ESComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia · ESFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESGovernment of Catalonia · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital del Mar Research Institute · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias · ESSpanish Clinical Research Network · ESUniversidad de Huelva · ESUniversidad de León · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The St Gallen Conference endorsed in 2013 a series of recommendations on early breast cancer treatment. The main purpose of this article is to ascertain the clinical factors associated with St Gallen-2013 recommendations accomplishment. A cohort of 1152 breast cancer cases diagnosed with pathological stage < 3 in Spain between 2008 and 2013 was begun and then followed-up until 2017/2018. Data on patient and tumour characteristics were obtained from medical records, as well as their first line treatment. First line treatments were classified in three categories, according on whether they included the main St Gallen-2013 recommendations, more than those recommended or less than those recommended. Multinomial logistic regression models were carried out to identify factors associated with this classification and Weibull regression models were used to find out the relationship between this classification and survival. About half of the patients were treated according to St Gallen recommendations; 21% were treated over what was recommended and 33% received less treatment than recommended. Factors associated with treatment over the recommendations were stage II (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 4.2, 2.9-5.9), cancer positive to either progesterone (RRR = 8.1, 4.4-14.9) or oestrogen receptors (RRR = 5.7, 3.0-11.0). Instead, factors associated with lower probability of treatment over the recommendations were age (RRR = 0.7 each 10 years, 0.6-0.8), poor differentiation (RRR = 0.09, 0.04-0.19), HER2 positive (RRR = 0.46, 0.26-0.81) and triple negative cancer (RRR = 0.03, 0.01-0.11). Patients treated less than what was recommended in St Gallen had cancers in stage 0 (RRR = 21.6, 7.2-64.5), poorly differentiated (RRR = 1.9, 1.2-2.9), HER2 positive (RRR = 3.4, 2.4-4.9) and luminal B-like subtype (RRR = 3.6, 2.6-5.1). Women over 65 years old had a higher probability of being treated less than what was recommended if they had luminal B-like, HER2 or triple negative cancer. Treatment over St Gallen was associated with younger women and less severe cancers, while treatment under St Gallen was associated with older women, more severe cancers and cancers expressing HER2 receptors.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantModels, BiologicalAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSpainSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID33686151
PMCPMC7970883
OpenAlexW3135413036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.