Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33686091›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

Key factors in a rigorous longitudinal image-based assessment of retinopathy of prematurity.

Tatiana R Rosenblatt, Marco H Ji, Daniel Vail, Cassie A Ludwig, Ahmad Al-Moujahed, Malini Veerappan Pasricha, Natalia F Callaway, Jochen Kumm, Darius M Moshfeghi

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatiana R RosenblattDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford School of Medicine, 2452 Watson Court, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA. tatianar@stanford.edu.
Marco H JiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford School of Medicine, 2452 Watson Court, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
Daniel VailDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford School of Medicine, 2452 Watson Court, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
Cassie A LudwigDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford School of Medicine, 2452 Watson Court, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
Ahmad Al-MoujahedDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford School of Medicine, 2452 Watson Court, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
Malini Veerappan PasrichaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford School of Medicine, 2452 Watson Court, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
Natalia F CallawayDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford School of Medicine, 2452 Watson Court, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
Jochen KummDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford School of Medicine, 2452 Watson Court, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
Darius M MoshfeghiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford School of Medicine, 2452 Watson Court, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To describe a database of longitudinally graded telemedicine retinal images to be used as a comparator for future studies assessing grader recall bias and ability to detect typical progression (e.g. International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity (ICROP) stages) as well as incremental changes in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Cohort comprised of retinal images from 84 eyes of 42 patients who were sequentially screened for ROP over 6 consecutive weeks in a telemedicine program and then followed to vascular maturation or treatment, and then disease stabilization. De-identified retinal images across the 6 weekly exams (2520 total images) were graded by an ROP expert based on whether ROP had improved, worsened, or stayed the same compared to the prior week's images, corresponding to an overall clinical "gestalt" score. Subsequently, we examined which parameters might have influenced the examiner's ability to detect longitudinal change; images were graded by the same ROP expert by image view (central, inferior, nasal, superior, temporal) and by retinal components (vascular tortuosity, vascular dilation, stage, hemorrhage, vessel growth), again determining if each particular retinal component or ROP in each image view had improved, worsened, or stayed the same compared to the prior week's images. Agreement between gestalt scores and view, component, and component by view scores was assessed using percent agreement, absolute agreement, and Cohen's weighted kappa statistic to determine if any of the hypothesized image features correlated with the ability to predict ROP disease trajectory in patients. The central view showed substantial agreement with gestalt scores (κ = 0.63), with moderate agreement in the remaining views. Of retinal components, vascular tortuosity showed the most overall agreement with gestalt (κ = 0.42-0.61), with only slight to fair agreement for all other components. This is a well-defined ROP database graded by one expert in a real-world setting in a masked fashion that correlated with the actual (remote in time) exams and known outcomes. This provides a foundation for subsequent study of telemedicine's ability to longitudinally assess ROP disease trajectory, as well as for potential artificial intelligence approaches to retinal image grading, in order to expand patient access to timely, accurate ROP screening.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOphthalmoscopyTelemedicineFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleRetinopathy of Prematurity

Identifiers

PMID33686091
PMCPMC7940603
OpenAlexW3134535480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.