Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33686061›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Predicting the public health impact of a malaria transmission-blocking vaccine.

Joseph D Challenger, Daniela Olivera Mesa, Dari F Da, R Serge Yerbanga, Thierry Lefèvre, Anna Cohuet, Thomas S Churcher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Population heterogeneity in Plasmodium vivax relapse risk.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Malaria vaccines: a new era of prevention and control.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Seasonal dynamics ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Optimal control of a two-group malaria transmission model with vaccination.Network modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Monoclonal antibodies for malaria prevention.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Joseph D ChallengerMedical Research Council Centre for Global Infections Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. j.challenger@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6029-1733
Daniela Olivera MesaMedical Research Council Centre for Global Infections Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6190-2855
Dari F DaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0002-9199-9133
R Serge YerbangaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0001-8345-0880
Thierry LefèvreMIVEGEC, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9736-6142
Anna CohuetMIVEGEC, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1876-5656
Thomas S ChurcherMedical Research Council Centre for Global Infections Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8442-0525
Imperial College London · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BF

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 215143/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transmission-blocking vaccines that interrupt malaria transmission from humans to mosquitoes are being tested in early clinical trials. The activity of such a vaccine is commonly evaluated using membrane-feeding assays. Understanding the field efficacy of such a vaccine requires knowledge of how heavily infected wild, naturally blood-fed mosquitoes are, as this indicates how difficult it will be to block transmission. Here we use data on naturally infected mosquitoes collected in Burkina Faso to translate the laboratory-estimated activity into an estimated activity in the field. A transmission dynamics model is then utilised to predict a transmission-blocking vaccine's public health impact alongside existing interventions. The model suggests that school-aged children are an attractive population to target for vaccination. Benefits of vaccination are distributed across the population, averting the greatest number of cases in younger children. Utilising a transmission-blocking vaccine alongside existing interventions could have a substantial impact against malaria.

Indexed as

Public HealthAdolescentAdultBurkina FasoChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantMalariaMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesMiddle AgedPrevalenceVaccinationYoung AdultMalaria Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID33686061
PMCPMC7940395
OpenAlexW3135392089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.